Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Reservation and Media

Mypic Vision of Media : a letter of support to Pro Reservation Front


The media has shown its true colours. Indian upper castes are worst than the South African whites during the aparthied days. It is more shocking how the media has become a party in this entire campaign to defame the Dalits and Bahujans. Obsessed with merit, these upper caste boys and girls simply do not know the history of social justice movement. Perhaps, because the arrogance does not allow them read the great works of Ambedkar, Phule, Periyar, M.N.Roy or even the work of Vivekananda againt priesthood.I have posed a question of ethic also. Media should report impartially. But can you expect the disciples of Dronacharyas and Parshurams to be impartial. Now the religous thugs are also in the fray, preaching us how the reservation would divide the country. They do not want to admit that their forefathers had divided the country by inventing the 'cast system', India's only 'great' invention.The media led by the upper caste seculars as well as Sangh parivar fed saffronites, have crossed all their limits of decency. I would say, they have lost their mental balance. They have become a party to destroy people's mendate. They use democracy just to 'market' them in front of the western world to get resources and funds. Otherwise, these guys have hatred for democracy because democracy has threatened India's caste structure and their old 'mathadhis'. The new mathadis will also feel the heat once they get exposed. Democracy ultimately would not allow any one to become Mathadhis because every identity has mutliple identities in India and every one want to excel. It is a great thing that every one want to succeed and live a life successfully, then why are the upper caste unable to digest this. Why are they unable to admit that there are others also who have merit. Merit is not just speaking English or abusing or misquoting others. Merit is in the shirts and trousers available in Fab India and Dastakars and which these 'seculars' as well as capitalists both together wears. All of them are created by the Dalit, backward and Muslim women. How much these upper caste masters give to them in terms of money ?If reservation should be on the basis of economy, how many brahmins are ready to leave Tirupathi and Badrinath. Can they ask a Dalit or a backward to be the priests of these temples ? How many brahmins are cleaning toilets or carrying nightsoil. Definitely there may be many 'poor', 'uneducated' brahmins who might not be a doctor or even a primary school teachers, how many of them apply for a job of manual scavenger ?The government should not succumb to this blackmail. I want to ask one question of ethics. Christian girls from Kerala are the backgone of nursing profession in India. Violence against Christian has increased all over the country. Government is not recognising the Christian Dalits. Should the Chrisitian community ask its nurses as well as its school to keep off indefinitely unless the demands are met. India's 'world class' medical industry would collapse immediately. We can live without these castiest doctors but it is impossible to live without the nurses.Another most important thing is should the Dalit Safai Karmacharis all over the country should go on indefinite strike for a raise in their salary and against their continuous humiliation. India would come to a stand still.I am sure the court would then not say 'strike' is illegal. I am not surprised, therefore, when Supreme Court of India use 'polite' words to the upper caste doctors to end the strike. The same courts have rejected 'right to strike' of the labour community. It is up to us to explain things to people.Rajdeep Sardesai spoke against Mr Udit Raj on the reservation issue. Rajdeep should inform us how many Dalits and bahujans are there in his organisation ? Does he think that there is not a single Dalit and backward community person in this country who can make a presentable face ? Does he think, all those notorious brahmin and bania presenters the best in the industry ? I have a challenge.These upper caste seculars have exposed their characters. The only option is now for all the truely seculars ( who can take on the religious gangs and thugs also)to come out and unite. The only option for India is to demolish this is to strengthen alternative media, alternative medical college, alternative institutions of execellence exclusively meant for Dalits and backward communities.Why should we not demand Several exclusive National Universities, medical colleges exclusively for Dalits and backward communities like AMU? Why don't the Christian Insittutions, who have money and manpower, employ Dalits and train them ? Why don't the Dalit elite class, which has money also start their own institutions ?You can not just remain mute to this upper caste intellectual violence and the most dangerous and crude propaganda war that we have ever witnessed. Let this propagandist media be demolished by more people friendly alternative media. It is time we think over all the alternative for our people.Finally, those who have been supporting privatisation, should now realise, that the INdian Industries run by the Banias and their chums would not ever do justice with Dalits and backward communities even if "Mira Kumar' feel so. It is not possible. Start your own industries, own banks and ofcourse, the government cannot abdicate its responsibility.Come friends. The only answer is to question our own leaders who have kept quiet on the issue. It is more than ironical that major stakeholders of the vote bank of Dalits and backward have chosen to remain quiet. Shockingly, those who give this slogan, Dalit-brahmin bhai bhai and backward Brahmin bhai bhai, are ignoring and betraying the greater cause of both the communities. An Alliance of Dalits can only be possible with those forces who are ready to join their struggle of human rights, who reject institutional ostracisation of Dalits and who are equally oposed to crony capitalism of exclusive Indian quality. Dalits can not be with those who are religious lunatics and have faith in caste practices of the primitive period.

Vidya Bhushan Rawat
9:34 PM

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Reservation would increase efficiancy


IN-FOCUS: Reservations will add to efficiency: Medha Patkar
DailySouthAsian
---------------
RESERVATIONS WILL ADD TO EFFICIENCY, CREATIVITY: GOVT. SHOULD NOT
BACKTRACK
IMPLEMENT PAST POLICIES: CARE FOR NEEDY STUDENTS
------------------------------------------------
The People's Movements all over India demand that the Union
government must implement the constitutional amendment to reserve the
seats for the other backward communities without any delay and see
that all the earlier policies, decisions assurances regarding the
affirmative actions in favour of the backward castes are implemented
fully.

We condemn the deliberate lethargy on part of governments regarding
implementing already approved policies of Mandal Commision
recommendations. Even now, thousands of seats in educational and
professional arena are not filled - rather they are made 'open' for
want of 'suitable candidates' from the scheduled castes, scheduled
tribes or backward classes. We demand that all the unfilled seats
must be filed with the due representation of the concerned classes.
With this we make a strong plea for strengthening the common school
policy, common technical and higher education policy and equipping
them with quality education, resources and due attention. The newly
introduced elitist streak in the higher technical education should be
abolished. There should be common public institutions imparting
finest quality technical and professional education. The
privatization and coprporatization of education and highly technical
profession must stop. They are being educated and employed on the
basis of public spending. So they must follow the wishes of the
people of this country. Therefore there should also be reservations for the backward classes
in private enterprises.

For Efficiency and Creativity
----------------------------
The policy of reservations for the deprived classes in the higher
and technical education and professions is an opportunity to add to
the quality, creativity and efficiency in the educational and
professional fields. The reservations must be seen not as 'doling
out' something for the 'deprived classes', but it is mark of adding
to the experiences, creativity and knowledge bases of various
aspects in our public life. Over 70 percent of the workforce in the
country is not just manual laborers; they come with their own
intelligence, imaginativeness, innovations and resourcefulness. It
would make our productive processes and economy varied and richer.
Just look at U.S. and other countries where all sections of
populations are brought in the vortex of education, sports and other
professions. We have to be proud of the fact that we would be much
richer nation with the participation of such brains in our social-
economic activities in such a large and varied scale.
From all these angles, it is high time that the private institutions,
industries and service sector also must be made to accept the
reservation policy. These industries will have to be made aware that
they operate in India, and they will have to follow the Indian
Constitution and law. If they threaten to go outside India, let them
go and we shall see whether they get such subsidized water, land,
cheap labour, pliant state elsewhere in the world. These
industrialists are not making any favor for the people; rather they
exploit the people and resources of this country. In this connection,
we also disapprove and will oppose the policies of creating
'special economic zones' (SEZ), where no India laws would be
applicable.

Though we quite understand the apprehensions in the minds of the
students and professionals from the general categories regarding the
narrowing space for competition, that alone cannot be reason for
opposing the reservations for the hitherto backward communities.
The Union and concerned state governments should initiate the steps
as to help the poor and deprived students and professionals in the
general category.

The unemployment and narrowing down the space for more employment
and educational opportunities is not due to the reservations of
seats, but due to the neo-liberal political economy that the ruling
class in India has adopted in collusion with the global capital. Even
without the reservations, the employment and education opportunities
in various jobs in India are being eroded and thousands of people are
thrown out of existing jobs. We demand that the Union and state
governments must end the embargo on the jobs in the public sector and
should start thinking of creating more jobs.

We appeal to the agitating students and professionals not to hold
reservations responsible for their anxiety and to understand the
deeper economic crisis we all have been thrown. We also expect the
supporters of the reservations to reason with the agitating students
and take them along, caring for their sensitivities and interests.
The young student and professional community must not be pitted
against each other, who otherwise are the harbinger of the future
changes and struggle in this country. We have to strengthen a united
struggle against the common adversary in form of national and
multinational corporate and imperialist vested interests.

Medha Patkar
National Convenor
Sanjay M.G. P. Chennaiah
National Co-Convenors

Merit of the Meritorous Doctors at AIIMS


Merit Only? Check AIIMS Post-Graduate Quota: Striking AIIMS docs live in a glass house

Document Actions

AKSHAYA MUKUL, TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2006.

May 23, 2006 NEW DELHI: The main grouse of AIIMS students — at the forefront of the stir against 27% reservation for OBCs — is that merit is being sacrificed at the altar of votebank politics. But they forget two things: 25% reservation that AIIMS graduates get in PG admission and the Supreme Court judgment of 2001 that declares the earlier system of 33% reservation for them bad in law.

"AIIMS students, who had secured as low as 14% or 19% or 22% in the (all-India) entrance examination got admission to PG courses while SC or ST candidates could not secure admission in their 15% or 7% quota in PG courses, in spite of having obtained marks far higher than the in-house candidates of the institute."

In fact, the SC, while stating that 33% institutional reservation is "unconstitutional", agreed with the findings of the Delhi High Court, which had earlier set aside the reservation. The HC had found that "AIIMS students, who had secured as low as 14% or 19% or 22% in the (all-India) entrance examination got admission to PG courses while SC or ST candidates could not secure admission in their 15% or 7% quota in PG courses, in spite of having obtained marks far higher than the in-house candidates of the institute." HC had analysed admission data over five years.
The apex court also agreed with the HC that the "figure of 33% reservation for in-house candidates was statistically so arrived at as to secure 100% reservation for AIIMS students. There were about 40 AIIMS candidates. The PG seats being 120, 33% thereof worked out to be 40." That meant all 40 AIIMS graduates were assured of PG seats. \nMerit here was clearly being sacrificed, the study showed. For instance, in the January 1996 session, an AIIMS student with 46.167% marks — lowest for an AIIMS student that year — got PG admission. However, an SC student with the same grades was admitted but denied coveted course such as obstetrics and gynaecology. The SC student got shunted to community while AIIMS students easily won berths in prestigious disciplines. \nTwelve AIIMS candidates were selected even though they got less marks than the SC candidate who secured 60.33% marks. Similarly, 16 AIIMS students got admission to PG courses even though they got less marks than another ST student who got \n62.16%. Basing itself on this study, SC said, "Institutional reservation is not supported by the Constitution or constitutional principles." "A certain degree of preference for students of the same institution intended to prosecute further studies therein is permissible on grounds of convenience, suitability and familiarity with an educational environment," it added. \nPreferences, the court said, had to be "reasonable and not excessive...Minimum standards cannot be so diluted as to become practically non-existent." In the similar vein, SC said, "It cannot be forgotten that the medical graduates of AIIMS are not \'sons of soil\'. They are drawn from all over the country." \nThe court reasoned that these students had "no moorings in Delhi. They are neither backward nor weaker sections of society. Their achieving an all-India merit and entry in the premier institution of national importance should not bring in a brooding sense of complacence in them".

The apex court also agreed with the HC that the "figure of 33% reservation for in-house candidates was statistically so arrived at as to secure 100% reservation for AIIMS students. There were about 40 AIIMS candidates. The PG seats being 120, 33% thereof worked out to be 40." That meant all 40 AIIMS graduates were assured of PG seats. Merit here was clearly being sacrificed, the study showed. For instance, in the January 1996 session, an AIIMS student with 46.167% marks — lowest for an AIIMS student that year — got PG admission. However, an SC student with the same grades was admitted but denied coveted course such as obstetrics and gynaecology. The SC student got shunted to community while AIIMS students easily won berths in prestigious disciplines. Twelve AIIMS candidates were selected even though they got less marks than the SC candidate who secured 60.33% marks. Similarly, 16 AIIMS students got admission to PG courses even though they got less marks than another ST student who got 62.16%. Basing itself on this study, SC said, "Institutional reservation is not supported by the Constitution or constitutional principles." "A certain degree of preference for students of the same institution intended to prosecute further studies therein is permissible on grounds of convenience, suitability and familiarity with an educational environment," it added. Preferences, the court said, had to be "reasonable and not excessive...Minimum standards cannot be so diluted as to become practically non-existent." In the similar vein, SC said, "It cannot be forgotten that the medical graduates of AIIMS are not 'sons of soil'. They are drawn from all over the country." The court reasoned that these students had "no moorings in Delhi. They are neither backward nor weaker sections of society. Their achieving an all-India merit and entry in the premier institution of national importance should not bring in a brooding sense of complacence in them".

Extending the damning logic, the court said in preserving quotas for its own students, "the zeal for preserving excellence is lost. The students lose craving for learning."

Curtsy : Times of India, 24th May, 2006

Affirmative Action in Prestigious US Universities

Dear friends,

Read the following interviews from Outlook Magazine, May 29, 2005 issue

'Diversity Is Key To Our Business Wins'

V-P, Diversity and Equal Opportunity Programmes, at Lockheed Martin Corporation on the company's commitment to diversity.

ASHISH KUMAR SEN interviews Shan Carr Cooper

When did Lockheed Martin start its AA and EEO programmes?

Lockheed Martin has had an equal employment opportunity programme since its inception in 1995. AA is a programme that became law with the passage of the Equal Economic Opportunity (EEO) Act, 1972. It states that employers, unions, employment agencies and labour-management apprenticeship programmes must seek to eliminate job discrimination and increase employment of women, minorities, veterans and the disabled. We have policies and practices creating equal opportunities for our workforce. \nWhat has been the experience with this programme?Our commitment to diversity made possible many of our key business wins. Today, we have more than 300 alliances, joint ventures and other partnerships in over 50 countries. All this needs a diversity of individuals, thoughts and perspectives. \nDid Lockheed Martin seek to patent its AA programme?Actually, we could not patent our AA since it is based in law. However, we are in the process of patenting an innovative model we have developed to measure the success of our diversity efforts. Our diversity maturity model (DMM) is based on an engineering construct, therefore easily understood by our predominantly technical workforce. Most importantly, it provides us with a common framework and definition to guide our diversity efforts. The DMM is an innovative way to take the measurement of diversity to a completely different level—one that goes far beyond race and gender to embrace the many ways that diversity and inclusion contribute to the success of our business. A key element of the DMM that distinguishes it from other measurement tools is that the scoring system we use is most heavily weighted toward an employee survey conducted annually. We are most concerned with how our employees actually view the organisation from a diversity standpoint and not as much by other factors such as the race and gender makeup of the workforce. \nDoes your programme differ from those at other firms?I believe the DMM helps us capture, to the best of our ability, what amounts to a cultural transformation of our business. I don\'t think many business enterprises can claim to have such a tool to measure cultural transformation—other than perhaps a database that is tracking the number of women and minorities in any given organisation.

Lockheed Martin has had an equal employment opportunity programme since its inception in 1995. AA is a programme that became law with the passage of the Equal Economic Opportunity (EEO) Act, 1972. It states that employers, unions, employment agencies and labour-management apprenticeship programmes must seek to eliminate job discrimination and increase employment of women, minorities, veterans and the disabled. We have policies and practices creating equal opportunities for our workforce.
What has been the experience with this programme?Our commitment to diversity made possible many of our key business wins. Today, we have more than 300 alliances, joint ventures and other partnerships in over 50 countries. All this needs a diversity of individuals, thoughts and perspectives.

Did Lockheed Martin seek to patent its AA programme?

Actually, we could not patent our AA since it is based in law. However, we are in the process of patenting an innovative model we have developed to measure the success of our diversity efforts. Our diversity maturity model (DMM) is based on an engineering construct, therefore easily understood by our predominantly technical workforce. Most importantly, it provides us with a common framework and definition to guide our diversity efforts. The DMM is an innovative way to take the measurement of diversity to a completely different level—one that goes far beyond race and gender to embrace the many ways that diversity and inclusion contribute to the success of our business. A key element of the DMM that distinguishes it from other measurement tools is that the scoring system we use is most heavily weighted toward an employee survey conducted annually. We are most concerned with how our employees actually view the organisation from a diversity standpoint and not as much by other factors such as the race and gender makeup of the workforce.

Does your programme differ from those at other firms?

I believe the DMM helps us capture, to the best of our ability, what amounts to a cultural transformation of our business. I don't think many business enterprises can claim to have such a tool to measure cultural transformation—other than perhaps a database that is tracking the number of women and minorities in any given organisation.



'AA helped Harvard Connect To America'

The co-founder and director of the Civil Rights Project at Harvard on the university's experience with affirmative action.

ASHISH KUMAR SEN interviews Prof Gary Orfield

When and why did Harvard implement its affirmative action (AA) programme?Like most other US varsities, Harvard implemented AA during the civil rights movement in the '60s. The period of the Alabama demonstrations to the death of Martin Luther King, that was when most colleges decided they needed to do something about this issue. In '64, the Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, and after that there's been no looking back.

Was the Civil Rights Act a reason for Harvard deciding to go in for AA?No. The federal government had only required AA programmes from universities with a history of segregation—in 19 of our states we had legally separate colleges and universities. But Harvard wasn\'t part of that. Outside the 19 states, AA is a university\'s choice. But most universities decided to go for it when the social protest movement started out. It made them think about the fact that they never really represented the population of the country in any kind of reasonable way.\nWhat has been Harvard\'s experience with AA? Students from every racial group have said that AA actually changed their understanding of a number of key legal issues. For example, their view of their professions, their view of society, their understanding of the criminal justice system, their understanding of rights issues...all these were affected. The vast majority of the students from groups that might have been thought to be critical of AA—White students, for example—actually said it was a very valuable educational experience. Studies show students who have been in diverse classes develop more complex ways of thinking about issues in general. They learn to take multiple perspectives on issues. \nWhat challenges have you faced at Harvard with AA? Admitting students isn\'t enough. You have to make sure they have financial support, the ability to make up for whatever deficit their previous education might have had.... (But) AA has been a great asset for the university. Without this, Harvard wouldn\'t really connect to a very large sphere of the US public. Right now, 42 per cent of students at public schools are students of colour. At Harvard, around 37 per cent are of colour. That doesn\'t adequately represent African American and Hispanic students but it is infinitely more diverse now. It\'s much more connected to the future of our society.

Was the Civil Rights Act a reason for Harvard deciding to go in for AA?

No. The federal government had only required AA programmes from universities with a history of segregation—in 19 of our states we had legally separate colleges and universities. But Harvard wasn't part of that. Outside the 19 states, AA is a university's choice. But most universities decided to go for it when the social protest movement started out. It made them think about the fact that they never really represented the population of the country in any kind of reasonable way. What has been Harvard's experience with AA? Students from every racial group have said that AA actually changed their understanding of a number of key legal issues. For example, their view of their professions, their view of society, their understanding of the criminal justice system, their understanding of rights issues...all these were affected. The vast majority of the students from groups that might have been thought to be critical of AA—White students, for example—actually said it was a very valuable educational experience. Studies show students who have been in diverse classes develop more complex ways of thinking about issues in general. They learn to take multiple perspectives on issues. What challenges have you faced at Harvard with AA? Admitting students isn't enough. You have to make sure they have financial support, the ability to make up for whatever deficit their previous education might have had.... (But) AA has been a great asset for the university. Without this, Harvard wouldn't really connect to a very large sphere of the US public. Right now, 42 per cent of students at public schools are students of colour. At Harvard, around 37 per cent are of colour. That doesn't adequately represent African American and Hispanic students but it is infinitely more diverse now. It's much more connected to the future of our society.


Curtsy www.outlookindia.com

Monday, May 22, 2006

Navjot Singh Siddhu must apoligise

Dear friends,

As you know the anti reservation stir is being supported by all those power elite in India who have lost touch with the ground realities and who wish to remain in the limelight through propagandist uppercaste media. In democracy, people have differences and have every right to speak but the way the anti reservationists are mocking at the merits of Dalits, backwards, Adivasis, need some serious thinking.

Navjot Singh Siddhu,a former cricketer and now a Member of Parliament from the Bharatiya Janata Party is one of the favorite TV stars these days. He would be making jokes at disabilities, on womens and caste and make 'indians' I mean upper castes laugh. In India you always laugh at others, at the disability of others, at the caste of others and at the colours of others.

Siddhu went to address a meeting of the anti reservationists doctors in Delhi on 20th and made some derogatory remarks against the OBCs, Dalits and other marginalised who are beneficiary of the reservation. According to Times of India, Delhi edition dated 21st, May, 2006 report Siddhu said :

" Kauva agar oonchi dal per chad jaye to woh bag nahee ban jaata, Insaan apne karm se ooncha banata hai

a literal translation of this is

A crow cannot become a tiger by sitting on top of a tree.. one become big because of ones Karma'.

This is shameful and atrocious. Siddhu has not only defamed the great preaching of Guru Nanaka who revolted against Caste system and brahmanical values and start his 'Sikh' dharma. I request all of you to expose this dirty campaign going around in India. It becomes more shocking when a member of Parliament speak such a racist language. Does Siddhu want to say that all those reservationists are 'crows' and all those 'martyrs' for the casue of their upper caste brothers are 'tigers'. Further, does Siddhu want to say that a scavenger is today cleaning the toilets because of his ' Karma' and all the Tirupati brahmins are there because of their Karma. But what can one expect from a party upholder of Manu dharma shastra.

This issue must be raised by the Dalit members of Parliaments and at all international forums. The Sikh Groups must condemn a man who has defamed his own community. Such racist slur on part of member of Parliament need to be condemned. In solidarity for the rights of all those who are victims of the brahmanical tyranny,

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Who will save the life of this Meritorious Dalit Student

Dear friends,

In this debate of merit verses reservation, the brahmanical crookedness is working overtime through media. A tiny protest of illinformed people has been made 'national' by the 'national' media. Those of us who have been working against this very system, internet and web remain the best alternative source to get our voices spread all over the world.

I had filed a case with National Human Rights Commission regarding the harassment of
a bright Dalit scholar who completed his M.Phil and is not being enrolled for Ph.D at the National Law University, Raipur. To day, I have got official confirmation from NHRC that they have send notice to Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Chhatishgarh in this regard and asked them to send a Action Taken Report in this regard with in four weeks. The notice was issued on 21st of April, 2004.

Abhishek Anand case suggest how Dalit face discrimination at different levels. It is doubly important for the government and educational system to ensure that issue of diversity and affirmative action become a part of our national life and not just 'sarkari' orders.
Abhishek Anand case suggest how Dalit face discrimination at different levels. It is doubly important for the government and educational system to ensure that issue of diversity and affirmative action become a part of our national life and not just 'sarkari' orders. I can also add here that a PUCL Delhi member about four years back, I investigated a story on the discrimination against a Dalit engineer working in a public sector unit in Noida. This Engineer had got a very lucrative job in a multinational company and yet his bosses were not ready to leave him.They stopped his payments. He was not allowed to go out. Finally, one day, he left India. Today, this engineer named as Jyoti Prakash Vishwas is out of India named as Abdul Rehman Vishwas.

Dear mediamen, please wake up. Leave your caste bias and report in the interest of the society, of the country. You have thoroughly disappointed us.

We must come out in street for the support of reservation. Let us nail down the lies spread by
the media.


Please do keep informing about your acitivities.

regards,

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Human Rights Commission
Faridkot House,
New Delhi April 6, 2006

Re: Harassment of a bright Dalit student in the Hidaytullah National Law University, Raipur

I write this to inform you about Abhishek Priya Anand, a student who enrolled for Integrated Interdisciplinary ( M.Phil-Ph.D\n ) course from Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur, Chhatishgarh. Abhishek took this four-year residential course offered by the University in July 2003.

According to structure, he should have been provided M.Phil degree in the very first year but that did not happen. His M.Phil was prolonged for one year and finally he got his worksheet for M.Phil after two and a half year. There has been no notification issued in writing to him as why has his case being delayed. Even when Abhishek wanted to enroll for the Ph.D, the University has shown no interest in dealing with him.

During my recent visit to Raipur to attend a National Seminar on " Towards a National Dalit Policy', I met Abhishek Priya Anand when he discussed the issue with me. I was shocked to hear from him the problems that he had been facing. It seems that the University authorities have targeted him deliberately that smell deep caste prejudices.


Abhishek has been a bright student all his life. He is a Master of Science from Sri Sathya \nSai Institute of Higher Learning, Prashanti Nilayam and got around 68% of marks. When \nhe enrolled for this \ncomprehensive integrated course, he never realized that he would face \na severe threat to his career. He was supposed to get teaching assignment from the second year but was denied the same. The students from other castes are clearly favored. He got his stipend of Rs 5,000/- for just two months only and tha too in the second year only. Most of the other student received it for over 5-6 months. None of them \n\nhave been informed as why the stipend was not given. In the third year, Abhishek was supposed to \n\nget Rs 10,000/- per month to pursue his Ph.D.

Abhishek has been a bright student all his life. He is a Master of Science from Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Prashanti Nilayam and got around 68% of marks. When he enrolled for this comprehensive integrated course, he never realized that he would face a severe threat to his career. He was supposed to get teaching assignment from the second year but was denied the same. The students from other castes are clearly favored. He got his stipend of Rs 5,000/- for just two months only and that too in the second year only. Most of the other student received it for over 5-6 months. None of them have been informed as why the stipend was not given. In the third year, Abhishek was supposed to get Rs 10,000/- per month to pursue his Ph.D. According to documents made available to us, a three member committee formed to look into the matter had come to unanimous conclusion that Abhishek be enrolled for the \nPh.D programme. The Vice Chancellor of the University Dr M.K.Shrivastava has not only not taken any interest in the case but also seems to have a prejudiced mind. After three years of staying at a place, the Vice Chancellor ordered Abhishek be thrown out of the University Hostel. Abhishek was told that since there is no faculty for his specific case, he couldn't be enrolled in the University as a Ph.D student.It is amusing that a University which officially offer courses in certain categories deny the same to one bright student and that too from a Dalit community which remain marginalized, not due non availability of merit or meritorious students, but with deep rooted prejudices in our system. It was easy for the Vice Chancellor to ask the student to go back but where would the student go. Abhiskeh has written to every one in the University including the Vice Chancellor and other State authorities but so far nothing has happened. It is imaginable that a student cannot go too far fearing a backlash from higher authorities who are out to destroy his career. Other Dalit students in graduate and postgraduate classes also confided with me in Raipur that their life is made difficult under the current administration. They are not allowed to venture out freely outside the campus.

According to documents made available to us, a three member committee formed to look into the matter had come to unanimous conclusion that Abhishek be enrolled for the Ph.D programme. The Vice Chancellor of the University Dr M.K.Shrivastava has not only not taken any interest in the case but also seems to have a prejudiced mind. After three years of staying at a place, the Vice Chancellor ordered Abhishek be thrown out of the University Hostel. Abhishek was told that since there is no faculty for his specific case, he couldn't be enrolled in the University as a Ph.D student.

It is amusing that a University which officially offer courses in certain categories deny the same to one bright student and that too from a Dalit community which remain marginalized, not due non availability of merit or meritorious students, but with deep rooted prejudices in our system. It was easy for the Vice Chancellor to ask the student to go back but where would the student go. Abhiskeh has written to every one in the University including the Vice Chancellor and other State authorities but so far nothing has happened. It is imaginable that a student cannot go too far fearing a backlash from higher authorities who are out to destroy his career.

Other Dalit students in graduate and postgraduate classes also confided with me in Raipur that their life is made difficult under the current administration. They are not allowed to venture out freely outside the campus. Abhishek wants justice to be delivered because his future is doomed if the University does t enroll him. He switched to Law from \nM.Sc in Chemistry. The University was offering the course and he shifted. He is hardworking and cannot afford to lose three years period that he has devoted to his new course including obtaining M.phil degree. A young student cannot be denied justice under the pretext of unavailability of faculty. Who is going to compensate him for his years that he has devoted in the college. I am enclosing the details of Abhishek Priya Anand which I have received from him through emails. I have got one copy of his letter addressed to NHRC when I was coming back from Raipur. We are also enclosing various petition of Abhishek\'s to the authorities including the advertisement regarding the course given by the University in the newspapers.We are ready to provide all other details to NHRC in this regard. As a social activist, who has been working on the issue of human rights of the marginalized, I must say, Abhishek's case is a fit case for NHRC to intervene effectively. His case reflects how the caste prejudices are still strong in our society. Chhatisgarh is under Naxal threat because Dalits, Adivasis are further marginalized and people are losing faith in the institutions. This faith in the institutions can only be restored if justice is not only done but also done speedily. Dalits have continuously opted for a constitutional remedy even when they have to face the brunt. I do hope that an institution such as NHRC would come forward to the rescue of young Abhishek so that his faith in Law and constitution remain intact.


Abhishek wants justice to be delivered because his future is doomed if the University does not enroll him. He switched to Law from M.Sc in Chemistry. The University was offering the course and he shifted. He is hardworking and cannot afford to lose three years period that he has devoted to his new course including obtaining M.phil degree. A young student cannot be denied justice under the pretext of unavailability of faculty. Who is going to compensate him for his years that he has devoted in the college.

I am enclosing the details of Abhishek Priya Anand which I have received from him through emails. I have got one copy of his letter addressed to NHRC when I was coming back from Raipur. We are also enclosing various petition of Abhishek's to the authorities including the advertisement regarding the course given by the University in the newspapers.

We are ready to provide all other details to NHRC in this regard. As a social activist, who has been working on the issue of human rights of the marginalized, I must say, Abhishek's case is a fit case for NHRC to intervene effectively. His case reflects how the caste prejudices are still strong in our society. Chhatisgarh is under Naxal threat because Dalits, Adivasis are further marginalized and people are losing faith in the institutions. This faith in the institutions can only be restored if justice is not only done but also done speedily. Dalits have continuously opted for a constitutional remedy even when they have to face the brunt. I do hope that an institution such as NHRC would come forward to the rescue of young Abhishek so that his faith in Law and constitution remain intact.

There are a few questions of propriety and ethics which should be asked from the authorities: How can they deny a student right to study further without completing his full courses. No show cause notices have been served to the student if he violated any order of the authorities. Can a student be responsible for joining a course if the University does not find faculty for the same ?. Why did the University go ahead with the programme ? Abhishek has not been given teaching assignment despite the fact that second year student often get the same. He was given stipend for two months only. Why has it not been given and why it was stopped. Universities action has given tremendous mental torture to a bright student and it has now asked him to vacate the hotel. Who is going to compensate for that.

We hope that a prompt action from NHRC will give justice to a Dalit student. NHRC should seek an explanation from the authorities as why have they been harassing a student who is brilliant and has been enrolled in the institution with all necessary requirements.


There are a few questions of propriety and ethics which should be asked from the authorities:
How can they deny a student right to study further without completing his full courses. No show cause notices have been served to the student if he violated any order of the authorities.
Can a student be responsible for joining a course if the University does not find faculty for the same ?. Why did the University go ahead with the programme ? Abhishek has not been given teaching assignment despite the fact that second year student often get the same.

He was given stipend for two months only. Why has it not been given and why it was stopped.
Universities action has given tremendous mental torture to a bright student and it has now asked him to vacate the hotel. Who is going to compensate for that.

We hope that a prompt action from NHRC will give justice to a Dalit student. NHRC should seek an explanation from the authorities as why have they been harassing a student who is brilliant and has been enrolled in the institution with all necessary requirements.
Thank you,

Yours Sincerely,

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Red Starts in Indian polity : Is India following international trend

Voters verdict threatens status quo in India By V.B.Rawat


When Nepal was in turmoil, Indian government send a former Maharaja of Jammu & Kashmir to talk to belligerent king Gyanendra to pave way for democracy in Nepal. While, Indians went overboard in eulogizing this effort, in Nepal, people protested against this Indian effort to save the skin of a thoroughly discredited Monarchy. Indian establishment’s unusual hurry in the internal affairs of Nepal was because of age-old fantasy in mind to keep Nepal under Indian subjugation in the name of Indian interest. No doubt, India and Nepal are friends but that does not give India freedom to support a king who was oppressing people’s movement through his brutal armed forces. Indian concern over Nepal comes from the growing clouts of the Maoists in that country. While Nepal has never called Maoists as terrorists or militants, the saffronised Indian ‘experts’ call them ‘terrorists’.

Indian worry is that once Maoists share power in Nepal, they would create problems in various Indian states particularly Uttaranchal, Bihar, Chhatishgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa. It is not unusual that every newspaper and electronic media covered this issue widely. There was this feeling that the red zone is getting strengthened from Pashupathi to Tirupathi and that India should do some thing to halt this.

What can India do to stop the red march of revolution? Can India government led by the middle class upper castes Hindus, whose interests are well protected in the United States and United Kingdom, do any thing to halt the march of left progressive forces?

If the government thinks that the issue of Naxalism is a mere issue of law and order then it is seriously mistaken. Over the years, the issue of tribal and Dalits have faced with vociferous protests by the ‘upper caste’ experts in India. When the government decided to give land in the forest to tribal, the ‘environmental’ experts began to lobby against the same. These champion environmentalists as well as ecological experts have land and guesthouses in prohibited parks also. Then the issue of social justice is violently opposed by the same section of society. Economic policies have played havoc with the marginalized.

The number of farmers committing suicide under compelling circumstances in various
parts of the country is increasingly becoming unstoppable yet remain unresolved. Slum dwellers are being thrown away without being offered a fair deal of rehabilitation. Big dams are creating another breed of unwanted people in the city. Political parties have failed to raise the issue of the concern of common man. Right wing think tank has brazenly taken over our intellectual space. The threat to freedom, freethinking has increased and communal, ethnic clashes all over the world.

As the oppression level increases, new forces of assertion will come up and challenge the
status quo. Whether government and media like or not, the forces challenging status quo have now started showing sign of their visibility. If indication from the world
over are any indication, from Evo Morales in Bolivia, to Lula in Brazil to Hugho
Chavez in Venezuela, Latin America is under the new assertion of the left and
progressive forces. The most fascinating part is the victory of the left in Italy where right
wing corrupt Berluscony was thrown away by the people. Europe is also showing sign of
continuous antipathy to the economic policies which has marginalized the local
population particularly the farmers and indigenous people.

When such is a change world over, can India remain aloof and isolated? Therefore, despite factual differences of the so-called left parties, it is welcome sign that they have come back to power in Kerala and Bengal. It is the principal of lesser evil to be applied at them. While the mainstream media may condemn the Maoist, they will have to contend with the mainstream communist parties. It is important that the government of the day learn a lesson or two from this. That their policies are completely antagonizing the rural poor. Policies in the name of poor, Dalits and indigenous people are hypocritical and have rarely served purpose. Government need to show more concern on this.

That CPM was able to retain power in West Bengal was a forgone conclusion. There
cannot be an alternative from so-called Mahajot. The alternative will have to come from
the left forces. In Kerala, Congress paid for its own policies. The farmers in that land of God continued with committing suicide. Big five star resorts have developed another culture of sex trade in Kerala like Goa. Local fishermen feel threatened but all this has never been an issue for those in power. Results in Tamilnadu have shown that the issue of OBC reservation is not that easy to be diluted. DMK has championed the cause of OBCs and would strengthen it further. That Karunanidhi decided to implement distribution of rice Rs 2/- per kg is a tribute to his statesmanship and commitment to the cause of poor of the state. In Assam, Congress could not muster a majority and the Muslims revolted against it. It clearly indicate Muslim’s resentment against the foreign policy of the government apart from that their continuous marginalisation.

The victory of Sonia Gandhi in her pocket borough Rai Barelly was a forgone conclusion yet the margin has some message for others in the Hindi heartland. One, those who were trying to raise the ugly head of Hindutva have been given a slap on their face by the people. That, people of Rai Barely and Amethi have voted beyond their caste and other local identities. That they consider Gandhi family as their own one makes some interesting analysis. One may also suggest that voting to Gandhi clan in this heartland is basically a vote for development. Uttar-Pradesh which is under the forces of ‘so-called’ identity assertion has not seen development. The social justice has not trickled down from a few communities to most backward and most Dalit communities, therefore resulting in further revolt of these communities against their own. The fact is that once development reaches the most marginalized one, the forces of caste and identity would disappear.

Emerging from these things are certain trends in India. That there is a demand for development at the ground level. Rural population still considers identity an important tool to assert. That land is one of the most important issue that India has. Development mean livelihood for the marginalized. Now, the so-called nationalist parties can claim to support ‘development’ yet entirely not in tone with that of the demands of the marginalized communities. Development does not mean destruction like people of Tehri and Narmada faced. Frankly, development does not mean displacement in the name of narrow nationalism. It is also clear that where the governments have failed people have resorted to undemocratic means. If we were a true representative democracy which has enriched people’s life in Kashmir, things would not have come to this pass. The situation in the north Eastern states continues to be in terrible condition.

Naxalism has grown in the area where the democratic polity has done very little. Look at Chhatishgarh or Jharkhand, the two states which came into being for Adivasis aspirations. And how come the state is in the hand of right wing forces who have unleashed a religious agenda on a different community, which was nature worshipper and has its own distinct identity.

It is not that these things have happened all of a sudden. The resources of the common man are on the grab. The issues of the nations have been hijacked by an insensitive media which could hardly be described as credible. If one goes by the reporting on Pramod Mahajan and later on reservation issue, we can understand where are the sympathies of this media. It wants to tell us ‘truth’ it likes. It does not want to hear our ‘truth’. Hence there is a tendency of categorization of truth between us and them.

It makes interesting study with continuous marginalisation of the so-called mainstream political parties. Indian Express’s editorial lament about this. It wants India under two party systems. How is it possible? How can Indians have faith in two brahmanical parties whose policies have been anti people? The only difference between the two is that one pretend to be secular and other does openly talk of a brahmanical state based on Manusmriti. Can we say that a united Europe would have only the Torries and Labour Party? No, it has a huge diversity and that should reflect. For India, neither BJP nor Congress is any solution. They themselves are repeatedly becoming marginalized.

The coalition politics is here to stay. If we take state wise situation. Uttar-Pradesh, Bihar are dominated by parties of social churning. One may agree with them or not but they talk of their identities. Bengal and Kerala under the self styled left. Chhatisgarh and Jharkhand under the Hindutva constitutionally but ruled by the Maoists for all the practical purposes, Andhra Pradesh where the strength of Dalits and left progressive forces is growing against the Reddy Raj of Congress or Kamma Raj of Telugu Desham. Maharastra again could be a stronghold of the Dalit backward forces. Tamilnadu is back to forces of backward identities. So India, clearly reflecting today, ready for change, if things are done carefully. The failure of mainstream left to wean away a large sections of Dalits and Adivasis and create a leadership of them is equally unfortunate like the so-called social justice parties condemning left as their biggest enemy. If this contrast is resolved, one is sure, the feeling of Indian masses who have rejected the new world order would be reflected in a rainbow coalition.

In Bolivia the left forces came to power after propagating an indigenous president Evo Morales. He won with a landslide victory. In Brazil, President Lula, who came from very similar condition. In India however, things are exactly opposite. The background of the leading lights of the so-called mainstream left comes from Oxford and Cambridge. They are landowners of powerful communities and that is why when poor has aspiration and understand dynamics of politics, he gets away from the left parties.

The global media strategy is that when you fail to defeat your opponents, just start co-opting them. One and a half years back, I traveled to my pilgrimage in Bolivia, at Che Memorial. It was a remarkable journey and I felt proud to be able to see one of the greatest icons of international youth even today, immortal Che Guevara. From Santa Cruz, which is the second largest city of the mineral rich Bolivia to La Hegeuvara, we had posters and discussions about Che. I could see how the Bolivian people were enjoying a film on their TV which jokes about the west and clap when a native Bolivian scold a British or an American bosses of multinationals who had spoiled the natural resources of Bolivia. When I reached the village where Che was executed which nearly had about 25 families today, I found to my deep surprise, a church in the memory of Che. Though every house had a Che painting along with a cross, Che was made a God in the entire identity politics of Bolivia. The church was using Che’s popularity to spread its wing among the native people. Ironical, it is, as Che had only international religion and not any particular Godly religion. The more shocking things were in store for me when I learnt that DFID and Care International were to use Che’s popularity for the purpose of tourism. They planned to organize tours to Che memorial which was in the mountains and since Che is still one of the most loving heroes in Latin America, people come over there in large number. That time Bolivia was under the World Bank President. Successive government particularly the military government under the orders of the United States had tried to hide this fact of Che Guevara from the people of Bolivia and despite that he still remained as the most revered star in Bolivia and corporate funding agencies are using his popularity for their own purposes.

Something on similar lines is happening in West Bengal where the corporate hunchos are fairly happy with the victory of Buddha Dev Bhattacharya. They started weaning him away from rest of the party making it his personal victory. It is alarming. Buddha may be smiling and the power in Delhi or CII may try seduce him yet he must understand that vote of people of India is against this very seductions. Mighty people have bitten dust world over. People find their alternatives themselves. The aspirations of people are that they want a good life and hope that leaders would deliver. It won’t work if Calcutta has a great airport and five star hotels to greet Narayanmurthy but rural Bengal continue to live in misery and hunger. West Bengal’s villages need to be upgraded. And yes, let this religiosity that kills people, be one of the objective of progressive forces in Bengal. It looks cynical how left be linked to such tyrannical caste structure in West Bengal where religiosity and age old traditions dominate human life, perhaps worst then Punjab where people rarely read books. The issue of migrant Dalits are important in West Bengal and government cannot absolve itself from the process of social justice by merely saying that ‘it does not believe in caste system.’ So mere intellectualism would not work. A clear stand against oppressive policies of both domestic and international level will have to be taken care of.

If the forces of the change want to spread over, India is an ideal opportunity for them. For they cannot ignore the vast anti caste struggle in India. Both anti caste struggle and anti class struggle have to join hand with the forces who are fighting against the tyranny of the global order which remain insensitive to the need of the people. It is therefore important that a federalist approach develops and importance of smaller and marginal identities are strengthened. I am sure that forces of change would not have succeeded in Bolivia if they had not selected Moralisis their leader who belong to indigenous community. Is not it a great honour for an entirely indigenous population and for that matter entire country that they had for the first time, a national leader from their own community? In Bengal, Kerala and Tripura, the left parties represent, not necessarily Marxism, but local, regional and linguistic aspirations of the people. They must realize that such aspirations are also building up elsewhere. India therefore remains hungry because it was dominated by those who gained from transfer of power from the British. Today, there is a hunger among marginalized to become mainstream, to take over the political power. That aspiration has to be taken into account and developed.

The Indian middle class is continuously sounding notorious. It does not fear left. It considers them their friend because of the caste character of their leaders. What it fears most is a caste assertion among the people and it is out to destroy that assertion. It is time we understand this danger of the forces like Hindutva who will destroy this assertion by invoking another grand ‘nationalist’ slogan and wean away these communities. India got a great opportunity for these forces to join hand in 1991 and since then the Hindu upper caste-upper elite have joined hand, thoroughly communalized to destroy any such assertion. They have worked on their fancies in the new global order. But the result of this fascist order are now out. Indians do not believe in capitalism but crony capitalism based on hierarchical order. It is not a competitive capitalism which might be there in the west. Here it is some people’s birthright to suck our blood. Now, it is the best time to strike. Already, the Hindu upper castes elite are up in arm against reservation and their doctors have come back to their blackmailing by striking the work. Anti caste, anti class forces should now join hand plan take over India. A change in India would send the right signal world over. Of course, by change, I mean, such forces should unite before the next Lok Sabha elections. A country like India cannot afford to be ruled a few cronies of the ruling elite both in the name of merit and nationalism. In that sense, the voters have given a verdict which can have everlasting impact on Indian political scenario in the coming days.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Literature : Dalits in Premchand's Stories

Premchand and his Dalit writings By V.B.Rawat


Premchand is one of the finest storywriter of India, whose writings are very much close to the grave realities of rural India, where caste and gender discriminations were rampant. He wrote at a period when Gandhiji was not only leading a decisive battle against the British Raj but also working on removal of untouchability and communal politics perpetrated by the Hindu Mahasabha as well as Muslim League.

Hindi literature was never as open to caste and gender inequalities as Premchand enriched it through his writings. Most of the writers like Pratap Narain Mishra, Ramchandra Shukla, Bhartendu Harishchandra and others came from upper caste background and rarely mentioned issue of discrimination in their subject. Prior to them, it was either bhakti, which dominated Hindi literature. There was rarely an issue of discrimination and biases in the Bhakti except for the strong voices of Kabir and Rahim. Both of them were systematically ousted and sidelined by the brahmanical kshatraps of literature despite their enormous popularity among the masses. Both Kabir and Rahim did not fit in Hindutva’s saffronisation process. Other than them, the authors were content with sophistry of Sanskritised Hindi though Bhartendu’s writings were linked to common man as he tried to instill ‘national pride’ in the form of growth of your own language and literature. Yet, Premachand was different from his generations of writers. May be one reason for that was his close linkage with Urdu. Most of the Urdu stalwarts those days were the outcome of glorious Ganga-Jamuni tehjib of United Province. In terms of Hindu Muslim relationship, there was not much difference. Muslim Zamindars and Hindu Talukdars were secular in their oppression towards the marginalized. Therefore, the authors and writers from this stream were more focused on communal amity and rarely raised the issue of feudalism and caste oppression. This secular class in Hindu and Muslim came from upper elite of Indian society. One reason for the growth of Ganga-Jamuni tehjeeb was that Shia Nawabs who ruled India depended heavily on Hindu bureaucracy which was predominantly Kayastha. That was the reason that despite being Kayastha, Premchand understood the dynamics of communalism and came to be known as progressive writer. Later, the influence of Gandhi is found very well in all his writings. Yet, Premachand caste characters do not do justice to his narratives. Therefore, it would not be unfair to say that Premchand used stereotyped image of Dalits and day today idioms used against them in the Hindi heartland to strengthen the plots of his stories. In this way, rather than helping the cause he might well have hurt the issue of Dalits awakening in the Hindi heartland. The fact is that no Dalit awakening ever seems to matter for Premchand otherwise that would have been reflected in his writings.

No doubt credit should go to Premchand for bringing these issues in his popular writings yet they don’t make him a revolutionary writer. Many Dalit writers had complained about Premchand for being rhetorical and insensitive to Dalit issue and blamed him for lumpunisation of Dalit characters, particularly citing the example of his story ‘ Kafan’. Thereafter, many upper caste ‘experts’ joined in a dabate blaming the Dalits for being caste mind and ‘insulting’ an author who brought Dalit issue in Hindi literature. That might be true that Premchand brought Dalit’s character in Hindi writing but question here is in what form?

Time has changed and so has Dalit movement. There was a time when very few of the Dalit writers were involved in writings. Today, there is a new breed of Dalit writers challenging the upper caste mindset and their creations. In fact, writers like Om Prakash Valmiki and Suraj Pal Chauhan have challenged the brahmanical hegemony in story telling. It is a good sign of a vibrant Dalit writing, which was thoroughly absent from the Hindi heartland that new writers are emerging and so are new movement of different communities relating to their history, culture and assertion. Let me be clear here that Dalits writing has been very effective and powerful in Marathi, Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam and Bangali. Great saints like Namdev, Tukaram, Ayankalli, Ayotidas, Ambedkar and at later stage likes of Daya Panwar, Namdev Dhasaal have made a solid name for them. It is ironical that in the Hindi heartland such things remained absent but after the political mainstreamification of Dalits in the form of Bahujan politics, a large number of new writers have up with their superb narratives and description. This shows that there is an ambition among them to come up and challenge the brahmanical hegemony.

There is no doubt about the fact that Premchand was a ‘progressive’ writer in Gandhian mould. He was growing when the country saw Gandhi becoming a ‘spiritual’ leader. There were very few who could understand the danger of Gandhi’s saffron underneath. Premchand was not among those who could sense a danger of ‘mahatamnisation’ and the hysteria that it was creating. In the Eastern Uttar-Pradesh when Gandhi visited, masses came to worship him. Gandhi was not a political leader but a spiritual leader and his saffron helped him create a hallo around him. A remarkable and insightful social analyst like Premchand should have seen the hollowness of such a bogus viewpoint. True, the Hindi heartland was never known for revolutionary politics yet it look rather immature if he had not heard of Baba Ramchandra Das and his peasant struggle in Avadh or fight of Swami Achhootananda for the dignity of the Dalits in United Provinces. When Gandhi was at the helm of our nation’s political affairs, Ambedkar was also rising on the horizon. The interaction between Gandhi and Ambedkar on the issue of caste is still a subject of intense debate and no doubt about the fact that Gandhi comes out as deeply conservative orthodox Hindu lacking statesmanship. These debates were also published in Gandhi’s Harijan and Navjeevan. One does not know where Premchand stood on this. I am sure he must have been a faithful reader of these two papers that Gandhi brought out and conspicuously remained silent on the entire debate.

The debate in the Dalit circle was ‘whether Premchand should be called a Dalit writer or not. The fact is that Premchand cannot be termed as a Dalit writer, not because he was not born into a Dalit family. Some people might bring that criteria also but I am sure if one goes by Premchand’s writing, there is nothing specific which a Dalit could be proud of his writings. Premchand has used common idioms to project his view point. On certain occasions, he has tried to show ‘pity’ on a Dalit character yet no point his hero is a Dalit rebellion in true sense of Dalit revolt against the brahmanical hierarchy.

His stories always portrayed the Dalit stereotype. They were dirty, drunk and rustic. In ‘dono taraf se’ his portrayal of a marriage in the Pasi family of Manjhgaon is like this:
‘Today, there was a marriage in the Pasi family of Manjhgaon. I reached there. The Barat had come from far away. The Baratis were asking for liquor while the host had a big no for the same. The Baratis wanted that the women dance according to tradition with band.’

Another quote: ‘a woman who seemed belonged to a high class family said to another woman: Look at this Maharani. Her husband dine with Chamars and she has come here to purify herself.’ Clearly, indicates Premchand notion of high class.’ The lead hero of this story is a Brahmin and his social reform by sitting at Chamars house.

In his story ‘Saubhgya Ke Kode’, Premchand again showed inter caste marriage between a Dalit man who became ‘acharya, a teacher of theology, hiding his caste and a Brahmin girl. But this marriage is shown after the Dalit has virtually converted to upper caste philosophy. Even at the end the Acharya, who happen to be a Dalit, remain apologetic of hiding his caste from his wife Ratna, who was a Brahmin and yet married her. Perhaps, Premchand did not find anything positive in Dalit culture which could be shown as a history of Dalits. The fact of the matter is that Pasis ruled many parts of the state. Some of them had participated in freedom movement. In Chauri Chaura, a majority of those who sacrificed their lives were Pasis, Chamars and Muslims. There were very few Brahmins. It is strange that while Gandhi become hero of Chauri Chaura for his so called non violent struggle, the poor who lost their lives never got any mention in the writing of great people like Premchand.

His famous story “Mantra’ also end in victory of Sanatan Dharma over the forces of evil led by the Mullahs. He says that the Dalits converted to Islam because they did not find any respect in Hinduism and now since the upper caste priest has started sitting with the Dalits, the forces of conversion are no where. Again, the hero of this story is not a Dalit but a Brahmin whose heart changes once he see the threat of conversion. Premchand, therefore, does not find time to condemn the caste system. He only speak of violence against Dalits in a more superfluous way as Gandhian were known as. Rarely, he could be as strong against caste system as Rahul Sankrityayan who demolished the myth of brahmanical tolerance. Premchand’s Dalit are basically poor Harijans of Gandhi and upper castes have to involve them in their work. Premchand therefore write from an upper caste view point where the definition of a good man is who has change of heart, who is dining with the untouchables and visiting in their bustees. His revolt comes from the upper caste, who may take on his own caste men mildly though but rarely does his characters speak against caste system as such or brahmanical varna system.

It is not that Premchand was living in an isolated time. He might not have heard that much about Ambedkar in those days but definitely as a caste Hindu he, I am sure, must have heard of Vivekananda who x-rayed the brahmanical caste system and condemned the priest craft. India’s religion is don’t touchism, he said. While Premchand in Banarase might have been influenced with Gandhian philosophy, one of the contemporaries Rahul Sankrityayan revolted against the Varna system rejected the call ‘ return to Vedas’ and analyse excellently ‘tumhari Kshay’. But like Gandhi, Prem Chand cannot be called a revolutionary writer.

Critiques suggest that he was one of the doyens of the progressive writer’s movement in India led by the likes of Sajjad Jahir, Dr Mulk Raj Anand, Sahir Ludhianvi, Faiz Ahmed Faiz. I had the fortune to know Mulk Raj Anand from close quarters. Working with him over two and half years, I understood his humanism. At no point of time was Anand a religious man. He was a thorough rational. In 1927 he wrote his novel ‘Untouchable’ which was a landmark. The description of the untouchable boy Bakha in this novel is unparallel. Inspite of his often rhetorical remark of being a Gandhian, Anand was a progressive writer who had guts to challenge even Gandhian thoughts. He was one among those who never recited Ramdhun at Gandhi’s ashram. If writings on Dalits are concern, Mulk Raj Anand remained far ahead of Premchand and his contemporaries. His Bakha has faith in modern flush system and does not mince word in exposing brahmanical hypocrisy.

Premchand’s ‘Kafan’ remain one of the worst stories as far as sensitivities towards Dalits were concern. He made Chamars look as if all of them were ‘kamchors’. His Jamindar was a kind person but according to author ‘showing kindness to Ghisu, a chamar, was like painting a black blanket with black colour.’ Can a writer who we claim to be icon of Hindi writing be such insensitive and castiest in his approach ? Premchand comes out as a prejudiced upper caste man in this story. Thankfully, these stories are now history otherwise, Premchand would have faced strong protest from the Dalit awakening.

Clear enough, Premchand was either unaware of the strength of Dalit movement and various other reform movements during the independence struggle or he deliberately ignored them. His Dalit characters are totally at the mercy of the ‘kind’ hearted upper castes. The heroes of his story are the caste people who rarely questioned the caste system and glorified the ‘sanatan dharma’.

No doubt, as a story writer Premchand remain outstanding as he desanskritised the Hindi language. His stories comes close to common man as he understood the psyche of the people of his time very well. He tried his best to portray the conditions of Dalits and marginalized though to change the heart of ‘caste Hindus’. His writings were not meant to awaken the Dalit masses against their systematic institutional oppression. Premchand thoroughly failed in attacking the institution of depressing caste system. He could not see any radical changes of revolt against the Varna system among the Dalits. It is more ironical because among the many Dalit-backward communities, there have been jokes and myths against Brahmins and Varna system.

It would not serve any purpose for any one to suggest that Premchand was a Dalit writer or not. This entire debate is out of synch as Premchand cannot be called a writer who wrote for Dalits. His entire theme is totally Gandhian meant for upper caste Hindus. There is no justification in terming him a Dalit writer or a writer who wrote for Dalits. He is none. However, that does not take away the credit from Premchand for being a one of the greatest story teller of our time. If his stories are to be seen from the purpose of stories that can shake the heart of even a powerful upper caste, then he might be a successful story teller.

Fifty years after our independence, it is essential that we analyse our so-called reformers, writers and historians. PremChand should be analysed like any other writer. Modern Dalit writers and analyst have a right to explode the myth build around Premchand. Any analysis of writings has to be based on the quality of his writings and not based on their birth. Premchand’s caste or religion therefore should not have any concern when we analyse his writings. Those who analyse Premchand out of his caste must realize that they also have a caste and if they write as per caste, twenty years later, their writings are also going to have the same scrutiny by their own caste men as they are doing to Premchand. However, scrutiny of a legend should not be termed as an offense. We must analyse our past and learn from it. Those who condemn the Dalit writers for questioning Premchand are the same who do not want to question Gandhi despite his mistakes. Such tendencies take us to fascist thought and action where every dissent is considered as blasphemous. Prem Chand is a legendary writer yet not beyond question. Given his mastery over subject, he could definitely have done much better. Some of the upper caste commentators have said why Dalit writers expect too much from Premchand. Unfortunately, that does not make a good commentary because it present them in poor light that they are afraid of constructive criticism. Nobody is bothered about what an author write. The problem rises when some one is imposed on an unwilling community as their ‘hero’ and ‘writer’. Both Gandhi as well as Premchand therefore cannot be termed as persons who brought pride and honor in the lives for Dalits. They had definite concern for them but did not have moral courage to question their faith and religion which was the fountainhead of this monumental blunder in the form of racial caste system. New generations of commentators as well as analysts have every right to question both of them and their writings. History is ultimately learning from the mistakes of our forefathers and not to accept whatever they wrote and said. That does not mean that we are being ungrateful to them. May be, it will give rise to new breed of intellectuals and writers who had the sagacity to stand up and challenge the status quo without minding getting published or not, even with the fear of facing a boycott from those in power. How can one call himself a creative person or an author or a critique if he or she is not a dissenter and cannot defend dissent despite being in disagreement with the same? Criticism of Gandhi and Premchand has to be taken in that spirit.

May 13, 2006

Friday, May 12, 2006

Remembering Che Guevara


Dear friends,

I am reproducing one of my fascinating journey in Bolivia to Che Memorial. Exactly over a year later, Bolivia is under a communist regime and their first ever
indegenous president. Latin America is reeling under a change. From Bolivia, to Brazil,Cuba and Vanujuela. The change in Europe is equally visible. Now, India is watching the same. Nepal is already on 'red alert'. Issue is not left or right, but continuous and depressing neglect by the rightwing elements in power. continuous sucking of people's blood and their resources will ultimately bring people out in street. Democracy cannot be allowed to be hijacked by the middlemen masquarading as political leaders. It is time to pay tribute to one of the finest international statesman named Che Guevara.

Regards,
VB


When Che Became A Market God

By V.B.Rawat

27 April, 2005 Countercurrents.org


When I got invitation to visit Bolivia the first thing in mind was to hear about Che Guevara. The longish flight timing gave me enough time to read some work of Che as well as go through Sunday Financial Times which has been carrying feature article on Che. It is interesting to notice how the some of the commentators in the west perceives people like Che. In fact, I had read many articles in Indian Press borrowed from the Western press on Che questioning his popularity in the developing countries. Therefore I was not surprised to read an analysis of a western journalist mixing Che’s work with that of Osama Bin Laden. These kind of comparison are not isolatory in nature, as we have seen them in India. They are not the work of an illiterate journalist but deliberate attempts to malign honest individuals who tried to challenge the status quo. Hence, if the upper caste journalists are fed up of every time mentioning Narendra Modi then club some else with him so that your soul is satisfied.
In a newspaper article one senior editor compared Narendra Modi with former prime minister VP Singh. The upper caste mindset in Indian media and ‘secular’ circle is always evident that you make try to club together a person who was responsible for killing of innocent lives in Gujarat with that of an entirely political movement against the Mandal Commission recommendations by the Hindu upper castes. I am not going to discuss here with this issue of mandalisation but the fact is somewhere we are clubbing together such issues and damaging the entire fabric.
The Financial Times columnist said that he saw big portraits of Che and Osama in a bus in the Lapaz, capital of Boliva. While I traveled a large part of Bolivia including Santacruz and the places where Che was executed by the American supervised forces, I was not fortunate enough to get such a picture as depicted by our friend. Even if some ignorant souls have put Che and Osama together, any good reader of history would never bracket them together. For Che was definitely a revolutionary while the other fellow a crude fundamentalist spreading hatred against non-believers and believers of other faith. It was identical of a Pakistani columnist putting Bhagat Singh and fundamentalists who attacked Indian parliament, together to justify the highest platform of democracy.
Interestingly, walking through the streets of Santacruz gives you disappointment as how Bolivia which has spontaneously superb mountain range and vast track of land has lost touch with its past. Not only the American control their land and money but culture and mind as well. And that is why even when certain people suggested that they had the best president of Bolivia, a completely non political person, I was surprised and shocked not to hear anything from the government quarters about the issue raised nearly forty years ago by Che and his contemporaries. While the educated Bolivian would like to leave their country for better jobs in the west particularly United States, the country’s native inhabitants live in utterly disillusioned circumstances. The wide gap between the cities and villages is reflected once you step out of Santacruz where people and culture has been deeply influenced in the Pepsi and coke and prostitution rampant in the streets.
My disillusionment with the political elite of Bolivia was because of their continuous antipathy towards the marginalized. May be it is because of their new found vocabulary of speaking international where they only talk of ‘funds’ and ‘donations’. Right from the president, to his ministers, every one talked of tapping the vast natural resources in Bolivia.
Ruling political elite as well as hugely funded NGOs ignores the issue of people’s aspirations for which Che fought in Bolivia. A truly international person who was born in Argentina, the very neighbor of Bolivia, and one of the outstanding revolutionary of Cuba along with Fidel Castro, Che went to Kongo and then made Bolivia his battle ground to fight against the military regime added by the US government. So such kind of internationalism is rare in today’s world when person leave their comfort for serving the human kind. Therefore, whatever the western media write about Che and Cuba, the fact is that both are the most wanted things in Europe and Latin America. Cuban Bars are very famous apart from Che and Fidel Castro in every part of the world. People enjoy the ‘spirit’ of Cuba. So it was great occasion for me to be in a Cuban bar and enjoy the dance there in Santa Cruz. And there I met many such youngsters who feel Bolivians should change the status quo, opined Cecila, 26 is a student of Social Sciences in Cochabamba, the third biggest city of Bolivia after Lapaz, and Santa Cruz. As I mention about Che Guevara and she become excited to discuss about him. She shows me her ring in which, a small photograph of Che Guevara is fixed. I discuss with her the current situation in her country. She is concerned about the American domination in every day life in her country. So on the one hand big companies have captured the small market of Bolivia, on the other side, we have the Church which is playing a crucial role here in daily lives of people and Cecila is very much against it. ‘Do the church work among the poor people’. Oh, no she says. They don’t work at all except the rituals they follow. ‘ We need a revolution and poor will be liberated, it is only Che’s vision that Bolivia can be an independent country.’
As I embark upon one of the most fascinating journey from Santa Cruz to Vallegrande, the main town which has accessibility to bus and roads, the local Buses, interestingly, tap the anti-American sentiments, in the films and laughs and clap whenever there is a scene in which the native heroine of the film befools a brown Saheb. I could understand the gaps between the cities and the villages, between the elite class and the poor. The mountainous terrains of Bolivia are simply superb. I did never see so many ranges of mountains anywhere in the world, including Latin America where I traveled earlier also. Such enormous diversity of nature has not yet helped Bolivia. In a programme, the minister for forest in Bolivia said that before the government gives land to the poor, he would ensure that there is no deforestation. He said that he needs to protect Bolivia’s vast natural resources. And the people got angry at his remark. An indigenous woman got up and challenges this nation. ‘ The minister’s remark means that the poor people destroy the natural resources or forest. Mr. Minister, first look into the work of the industries and corporations which have been there with the blessings of the politicians, who have destroyed the forest and not the native people. It is a blatant lie. Ironically, Bolivia has more track of land then its entire population but while the native people suffer from poverty, I could see the vast fields of thousands of hectare where the feudal lords over farming. It is through these lords that Bolivia is being governed. A country unmindful of what happened a few years back in Argentina when the upsurge against the policies of the government forced it to leave the palace.
After 7 hours tiring journey from Santacruz, I reach Vallegrande, a small town surrounded by mountains. At the town hall of it, we find a memorial of Che Guevara. For the first time, after reaching Bolivia, I feel that people still remember Che, though Cecila’s words were like music for me when she talked of revolution. In the evening as I reach my hotel, there is hardly anyone who could understand English language. Still whatever I could understand people remember Che as a revolutionary who sacrificed his life for the cause of the masses. My trip is arranged for the place La-iguvara where Che was executed on October 9th, 1967. This trip from Vallegrande is about 4 hours by taxi. The terrain is difficult and dangerous but beautiful and your eyes cannot close seeing such beautiful ranges. For miles and miles there is no habitat and one can understand how Che and his colleagues would have fought their battle here when even the transportation was not that easy. The roads are bumpy and dusty and my interpreter here was unable to control herself and fell ill when passing through the zig-zag roads.
Che might be a terrorist for the embedded journalists but he is a ‘God’ for others. As a radical humanist, I was shocked to see this ugly side of marketing of Che in this historical village where just 15 families live at the moment. This entire village is like a devotee of Che but what is shocking is that people have erected an statue of Che sided with a Cross. They consider him not just a revolutionary, but God’s angel. Every house in this village adore Che’s photograph and not just photographs but have grand paintings on the walls of the entire struggle of Che, which I have not seen anywhere in the third world. We are habitual of worshipping individuals but not their struggle. There are two museums in the village owned by private people. In one of the museum which was earlier a school and where Che was killed by the CIA sponsored military forces of Bolivian Army junta, there is a big painting donated by an Argentine fan of Che. People throng to this place, see the historical documentation of the great struggle to liberate masses. Photographs of the young comrades are there along with Che and Fidel Castro.
At about 100 meter from this small house is another museum where the personal belongings of Che have been kept by a local villager. Here we can see a number of things related to Che. His gun, chair, cap and jacket apart from his photographs with Fidel as well as their books on imperialism. There is a nominal fee of 10 Boliviano for the entry. Yes, this village remind me of the Dalit bustees in India which adorn Ambedkar. Everybody remember Baba Saheb Ambedkar and consider him his emancipator but here this thing was not that much visible. But the paintings of Che’s struggle against imperialism have been part of every house. For nearly 30 years, this village became victim of vendetta by those in power. Villagers were arrested just for their liaison with Che. I met Erma Roso who is a native Bolivian and was one of the prominent villagers when Che had arrived from Cuba to his mission here. Erma is about 60 years old and has six children. A few months back her husband died for want of medicine because there is no hospital here. Even taking a person in serious condition to nearby Vallegrande takes almost four hours if you hire taxi otherwise you have to walk. Said Erma, “ When Che arrived here in 1967, he did not know any one or talk any one. During his period about 80 families lived here but slowly they started moving out of village for the fear of government action. People were also afraid of Guerillas as they did not exactly about their activities”. Erma, poor native Bolvian, would serve Coffee to Che and prepare lunch for him. Though she may not be a ‘comrade’ or red flag holder, she considers Che a true revolutionary and hero of the masses. “ If he were a winner, things would have been different and people’s life here would have changed but since he lost the battle, the village had to pay a price for the same.”
Erma was witness to illegal killing of Che in the custody. The army had surrounded the village. Some of the villagers had conspired along with the army and they were passing the information of Che to the forces. After they were caught and brought here in the school. In the night she heard noise but no body dare to come out of their houses due to the military threat. During the first five years we could not even utter his name. Everything related to Che became blasphemous in Bolivia. His body was kept secretly and disclosed after many days. Bu t the role of the ruling elite of Bolivia was not only condemnable but the fact is that they did not face any charge of following international norms of killing an international political prisoner in the custody. His body was said to be buried at a place with three other prisoners at the air force base in Vallegrande which were found 30 years later. Now, there is an effort by the culture ministry of Bolivia to give it a shape though in the name of developing the Che Memorial, they have just a sign board about the historicity of the place and nothing to offer those who come from different part of the world and cry in this place.
Despite all odds, Che is a market. A country like Bolivia which is among the poorest countries in the world did not realize the potential of Che tourism. While government of the past continue to ignore this legendary, people worshipped Che for they consider that their country need a revolution and today’s political class does not have the guts to do so. So people of La-Higuera celebrate Che martydom day in October with great fan fare. Unlike us who cry on these dates, people in the village have festival, they sing and dance and thank Che for the great work that he did. Che could not have given much to this village but now the potential of Che tourism has again given life to the villagers. Perhaps, the posters, painting of Che in each house and all the places distinctly related to him, narrate the story of profit of Che tourism. Even the hospital at Vallegrande where Che’s body was brought for postmortem is a ‘tourist’ spot. People come here and write on the walls their love for Che. Che has been immensely popular with the youths of the world and that is why they throng this place to visit him. They cry on reading his writings and about his execution from the American supervised military.
But the biggest irony comes in two forms. One religious and other market both against whom Che spoke vehemently. None of us would have thought that Che would become a Christian God in his village. He could never have dreamt that the western market led forces would make use of his name for ‘helping’ the native people. Yes, truth is that both Care foundation (an international catholic organization) as well as DFID ( British government’s Deparment for International Development) have planned to develop Che memorial after they realized that Che has the potential to attract tourist to this small country and bring revenue to its empty coffers. So, both the organizations are now planning to start a package tour to La-Higuara so that the money earn from these tour could be used to raise funds for the native Bolivians. Interestingly, as I see Che’s statue along with Cross and as many of the villagers feel Che was some short of God, I feel one day the Christian revivalist would use him as the ‘greatest’ warrior of the community. But one thing is sure, the west cannot have double standard on a person like Che whose life is an example of what true internationalism is and who cannot be clubbed together with any other fanatic like Osama, but given the nature of market, who knows tomorrow, the American start a package tour for the friends and followers of Osama to Tora-bora or elsewhere to raise funds for the poor Afghanis they killed in bombing.

Victim of civilisation

Growing Deaths of tribal children: Clash of Civilisation

by V.B.Rawat


More than two thousand six hundred and seventy five children have died in five districts of Thane, Nan Darbar, Nashik, Amravati and Gadhchiroli of Maharastra during the past four months. By government’s own admission about 1085 children of less then one year of age and 1590 of between 1-6 died between April and July this year. In Vishakapattanam, over 2000 tribals reportedly died of Malaria. In Uttar Pradesh’s eastern part, encephalitis has caused death of nearly 300 children. 18 Children died in Raup village of Sonbhadra district of Uttar-Pradesh, last year, though reports of hunger and malnutrition continue to pour in yet we only rise up when reports of deaths makes headlines in newspapers and electronic media. The situation in many tribal regions of Andhra Pradesh and Uttar-Pradesh remain bleak and call for attention. The seriousness of administration on this is clearly visible when I saw a district magistrate in Uttar-Pradesh cracking jokes about Sonia Gandhi’s Italian origin to a friend who came from Italy to visit the tribal areas of Uttar-Pradesh.

In fact, many of us working on the right to food issue raised this issue with the authorities, filed petitions with institutions like National Human Rights Commission and now a public interest Litigation in the Bombay High court and yet nothing moves. The question is why are tribals dying of hunger? Will their starvation end with a red card from a defunct Public Distribution Shop that doesn’t really open every day.

One can understand that every time a hunger death is reported that belie our sense of India shining. Last year when the tribals of Sonbhadra protested at the collector’s office, the sub district magistrate blamed activist like me for ‘selling’ their poverty abroad. ‘I have seen poverty’, he preached, and rebuked the poor adivasis who were dying of hunger, that they should work hard to earn livelihood. Perhaps the officer was reflecting the general mindset exist amongst us that tribal and Dalits remain poor because of their ‘merit’ and sluggishness. There seems to be a complete lack of introspection on our parts to think that it might be public apathy added with bureaucratic highhandedness that have added the woes of tribal. Its interesting to know how can a nation matter for those who have lived a generation without two time meals. When the matter was reported at the national human rights commission, the state authorities went to Raup village and distributed 2 liters of kerosene, some wheat and rice. This kind of response is simply a frustration of a civilization which have inherent bias against a set of communities.

The issue of hunger, food security and natural resources are not separate as being suggested by many food rights ‘experts’. The fact of the matter is that hunger is an outcome of persistent denial of rights over natural resources. It is therefore not strange that those dying of hunger and malnutrition are mainly Dalits and tribals. Ironically, all those areas where hunger and malnutrition are being reported have been highly fertile areas, rich with herbs, ores and minerals. The other side of it is that corporations and industries have already occupied these areas without consulting local communities who have sustained the environment. Therefore areas such as Sonbhadra, Kalhandi, Palamu, Bastar, Chitrakoot are represent this paradox of our civilization where locals die of hunger and intruders make profit over their resources.

These kind of short-term measures are being offered for the problem which is he outcome of a complete failure of our system. Instead of a comprehensive land reform with rights over minor forest produce, ‘experts’ focuses on charities like ‘mid day meals’ and ‘Public Distribution System’, which have miserably failed in most of India except for Kerala, Tamilnadu and to certain extent West Bengal. The way the mid day meal is being distributed in the tribal belt and among the Dalits, would put any civilized person to shame. Mid day meals might have increased the enrollment of the students in the schools as reported, though the fact is that there are false enrollment for bigger quota, yet it cannot be termed as an anti-poverty programme. You cannot eliminate chronic hunger with these halfhearted undignified measures.

It is also interesting that the rich tribal belt with poor human resource development has become breeding ground for the ‘revolutionary’ politics. If reports were to be believed then over 25% of the country would be under the radical left wing organizations in next two years. The political system has completely let down the tribal aspirations. The civilization that we choose literally isolated them and made them a subject of ‘international’ ‘experts’ and ‘researchers’. The non-tribal hunted them out therefore allowing the radicals to instill a feeling of honour and dignity among them.

Forest produce have become out of tribal reach. Environmentalists are bothered about tigers while tribals are hounded out of their homes. Forest mafias roam free in collaboration of the authorities while tribals have to pay heavy price for entering into a no entry zone. Today, they are made as if they are anti forest and our city elite which destroyed forest has become the ‘real’ protector of the forest.

This conspiracy of civilizations has to end if we want peace. The tribal will either die of hunger or pick up guns as they are doing in many places. Every death of tribal child due to hunger is a justification of those who recruit them for instance justice and revolution. The deaths of innocent lives are not a matter of an ideological clash but a failure of civilization and a nation. Shining India means nothing for those who have lost their livelihood to our benefits. If the rehabilitation of tribal remains unfulfilled then both the battle of communalism and communism will begin with tribal land with more and more involvement of religious organizations on the one hand and revolutionaries on the other. Not surprisingly, the state of Orissa, Chhatishgarh and other areas have seen growth of both the Christian missionaries as well as Hindutva forces.

The future battle line is therefore drawn that hunger will further alienate the tribal and put them at the hands of those who have exploited their isolation for years in the name of dignity and identity. It is time to realize that tribal are the protectors of the forest and therefore uprooting them from their civilization would ultimately create immense social chaos detrimental to national interest.