Showing posts with label Vidya Bhushan Rawat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vidya Bhushan Rawat. Show all posts

Saturday, June 13, 2026

Love failed to conquer caste barriers in Uttarakhand


Ketan Lal's brutal murder reflect caste realities of 'Devbhumi'


Vidya Bhushan Rawat


The state of Uttarakhand which is known as 'Devbhumi' too means abode of gods, saw a brutal and barbaric murder of a Dalit youth who was in a relationship with a girl happened to belong to a dominant caste girl which is strictly prohibited according to traditional customs and practices. A young boy Ketan Lal aged about 18 years, from Shilpkar community, yes it is the known name for the Dalits in Uttarakhand, was called by his girl friend who happened to belong to a Rajput community, to her home in the middle of night, in Tehri town. Ketan's brahmin friend Diwakar Dimri took him to girl's house on his bike where both were caught by girl's father Yashvir Singh Panwar and his father and locked up in the room. Both were beaten up but the main beating was kept for Ketan. After the brutal and merciless beating. According to a report in the Hindustan Times five important find out of the Ketan's report.

Deep bruises on victim's body, covering his back, chest, and limbs.
Pliers were used to pluck the teenager's fingernails and toenails.
Nails were driven into his feet.
Severe injuries were caused to his genitals.
Both victim and his friend assaulted with sticks
There is outrage everywhere due to the amount of brutality in this case. The police as usual has arrested the accused Yashvir Singh Panwar and his father. It is reported that Ketan's friend Diwakar too has been beaten mercilessly and admitted to the hospital in Rishikesh though many people have doubt about it as they feel Diwakar might have been a conduit of Yashvir Panwar to bring Ketan to his home. Sad part is that caste polarisation is so much that people have lost all their senses. Let the police investigate the case honestly and look at all the angles in it. Diwakar should be provided protection as he is a crucial witness to the incident and must be knowing details of the case.
The problem in Uttarakhand is that the cases filed under the SCST prevention act rarely go till the final stage. This is actually the situation in most of India. I have seen some of the cases in Uttar Pradesh where the attempt of the government and the so called lawyers is to get the family 'compensation'. As the cases move slow the people lose interest and families are destined to accept the dirty reality that everything move slowly.
The violence against Dalits or the caste discrimination in the so called Devbhumi is extremely high and need special attention. I have always mentioned that if Uttarakhand can get rid of the criminal and monsterous caste discrimination, it could really become a 'Devbhumi' but as long as it function proudly on brahmanical docterines of hierarchical system, it would be heading for social unrest in future.
The main issue is how far the Uttarakhand politicians and civil society take interest in it. Will they stand up with candles and come in the street to decry this criminal and barbaric act. We know that violence against Dalits never make a main news in Uttarakhand. Many temples in Jaunsar still dont give entry to them. SC ST act is never implemented in the district as technically entire Jaunsar region is declared as Scheduled Tribe area. So violence in this region against Dalit is extremely high and most of the time never reported in the media.
Political activist Jagadish Chandra who belonged to a Shilpkar community, was murdered by his father in law in Almora who was against his relationship with daughter. The brutal murder took place around 1st September 2022 in Almora but so far we dont know where is the case. This is absolute criminality that there are no special courts in Uttarakhand. It is time government form special courts in the state and give a time frame to finish these cases.

While these cases are not new or surprising as India has not yet become a casteless society. Caste has become the easiest tool for moblisation and the political class find it easier. Inter caste marriages are highly unwanted and most of the time a challenge to purity of the caste system. Baba Saheb Ambedkar actually felt that intercaste marriages could be a way out to strengthen unity among people but today the governments are making laws to ensure people dont challenge caste hierarchy. All laws are being made in such a way that individuals dont have the right to decide about their future. Our marriage system is highly hypocratic and never respect the individuals and their choices.
Ketan is murdered. This is not the first murder for loving a person and it will definitely not be the last. It is not the only case in India. Right from Himalayas till Bay of Bengal and deep down Kanyakumari in Tamilnadu, India has one biggest unainimity in the caste crime against Dalits. I call it hate crime.

The problem is that one is not sure whether the girl loved him or not as callling him to her house in the mid of night was definitely a trap so she must be investigated. I have seen many places where girls actually compromise with their families. I have tremendous respect for Kowsalya, the brave woman from Coimbatore whose husband Sankar was brutally murdered by her parents because he was Dalit while Kowsalya belonged to powerful backward community. Kowsalya decided to stay with her parents in laws and strengthen them. She fought valiantly and ensured that her parents get the death penlty. She faced ostracisation from society but she challenged the brahmanical patriarchy. Today, she has dedicated her life for the cause of women's rights in Tamilnadu.

Uttarakhand has seen several cases of violence against Dalits in the past too. I mention a few of them here.

1.     1. Jagadish Chandra was a political Activist who married to his friend who was in love with. This is the case from Almora and happened on around September 1st, 2022. Nobody knows as what is the status of the case in the court and where is the woman who loved him ? You dont hear anything from her.

2.    35 years old Sohan Ram, a Dalit was beheaded by the Brahmin teacher Lalit Karnatak on August 7, 2016 in Pithoragarh. It more than 10 years and we need to know what is the final outcome of this case. Also important to know what rehabilitation methods were adopted for the family of late Shri Sohan Ram.

3. 3.      A Dalit man Jeetendra was murdered in Shrikot Tehri Garhwal for simply eating food at a wedding along with otherupper caste invitees on May 6th, 2019. It was reported that 7 persons were booked under the SC-ST Prevention of Atrocities act. Where is the case today ? What is the condition of Jeetendra’s family.

Interestingly, a case had come to the Supreme Court last year related to insulting a person from Scheduled Caste community. A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Hemant Gupta actually declared that if a person from SC community is 'insulted' inside a houses or in the private domain which no outsider has seen or not at public place then it is not fit to be called a caste crime and can not be filed under SCST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The cases popularly known as Hitesh Verma verses State of Uttarakhand, in which the court actually quashed the FIR filed against the accused by the person belonging to the Scheduled Caste community suggesting that a case of insult or intimidation against Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe  cannot be made unless committed in a public space and in public view. The crisis in India is getting much deeper as neither the media nor the judiciary seems to feel the urgency to address the issue of social justice and caste discrimination.

Hence it is important to understand and see whether the girl who called Ketan to her house stand up and speak ? Will the Uttarakhand police act honestly in this case and take it to a logical conclusion. It depend on how Uttarakhand's political parties, civil society and media act on this issue and does not forget it after some time. So far the record of the state apparatus in the matter of violence against Dalits in the state has been extremely poor and does not reflect any hope but we must put pressure. Devbhumi must become an insanbhumi and should not remain caged to the narrow confines of the brutal brahmanical hierarchical caste system. It is time to hit at it and follow the constitutional morality where each individual has a right to have his or her own choice. Will India ever allow this ? Talks of 'biggest' 'democracy' sound too hollow. Let us see how the administration and state government act on this case. Ketan must get justice and we must not hide the names and jaatis of people who do it. If we dont want jaatis to be generalised then the time has come for these jaatis to speak up against this culture of violence and disown such criminal minds from the community.

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Colonialism and Christianity in Colombia

 


Remnants of the colonial past in Colombia and liberation theology of Abya Yalla

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

 

 

Colonialism spread all over the world not by merely subjugating the native and indigenous communities physically but also suppressing their culture and language while imposing its own value system. The impact of Church and Christianity in spreading the European order in Latin America is well known but always kept as ‘international secret’.  It is also a fact that the later stage, Church became the biggest force in bringing peace and order in the country. It also became the symbol of the resistance against the colonial power. The beautiful church that I visited in central Bogota, also witness to various processes of change that Colombia had undergone since 15th century till date. Established by some Spanish merchants later it becomes the symbol of Colombian national identity.

Veracruz

Church of the Veracruz stand taller near the Bolivar Square and is a reminder of the history of Christianity in Colombia. My dear friend Juan Manuel Quinche, took time off from his busy schedule to accompany me to have a city walk in the old Spanish area of Bogota. Apart from the grand Bolivar Square and lively streets, this Church is known for its grandeur and historical connection with Colombia’s independent movement. It started in 1631 with Veracruz Brotherhood


This church is actually the national identity of Colombia as num




erous heroes of the independent movement are buried there. It is said that between June and November 1816, approximately 80 heroes of Colombia's independence were shot dead during the Spanish reconquest and were buried in this church, since the Brotherhood of Veracruz was responsible for assisting those executed and burying them in the grave of this church.

Inside church looked more amazing. It is a history church that way. Flags of different countries ‘emerged out’ of Gran Colombia are flying high apart from a Vatican Flag. Interestingly, Gran Colombia included Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Panama.

Juan gives me the details, ‘the flags, from left to right, those correspond, to Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, (I think the yellow and white is one from the dioceses -which is the religious territorial authority elected by the Pope-), Colombia, Venezuela and I think Chile of what I remember. They are the flags of what intended to be 'The big Colombia', the big nation promoted by Simón Bolívar and other liberators that followed him. And as Veracruz was a church where the many heroes of the independence war were buried, those flags are also a memory of that idea’.




A military person too, is there inside the church, as this is an important national monument. Arnold Perez, welcome me and Juan. He can’t speak English but Juan act as my interpreter. ‘Where are you from and what made you visit here’, he says. I am from India and want to see this historical church. ‘Are you a Christian, he asks. I am a humanist and respect all the faiths, I said. I have tremendous respect for the Christians for the amount of work they have done in our country, I says particularly in the field of health, education and developmental work. Arnold, give me details about how important this church is in the life of Colombian people as it is witness to the resistance movement against the colonial power. I tell him that it is a grand church and beautiful one. I proudly show us the Vatican flag too. He listens to my interaction carefully and feel humbled by my appreciation. Finally, he says, ‘All religion speak of peace and equality’. He tells Juan to show me other places too.

It is evening time so there is not much public inside the church but there are several individuals who are there praying with their heads bowed down. Suddenly, an old woman appears in front of the idol of Jesus Christ. She bows for some moment and then come towards me. I don’t know what she wanted but she just holds my hand. With tears in her eyes, she asks me to pray for the well being of the leader of opposition in her country who had been shot at a couple of days earlier. I told her that I am from India but definitely wish the leader early recovery.

Though Simon Bolivar is the most iconic leader of this country yet in the modern time, it is Gabriel Garcia Marquez who made Colombia known in our part of the world with his extraordinary writings. Just a few hundred meters away from the famous Bolivar square is a beautiful library and Book shop in memory of Marquez. What impressed me in the streets in and around Bolivar Square was the numerous books being sold which suggest that literary tradition flourishing in this part of the world.



 

 

Plazoleta Del Rosario

As I walk through the lively yet crowded streets in and around the Bolivar Square, I come across beautiful traditional Spanish style houses. As we walk onward, it is Rosario Square or locally known as Plazoleta del Rosario established on August 6th, 1974 to remember the ‘Spanish heritage’ of the city. In 2017, the government of Colombia put it in historical perspective with installing a statue of ‘founder’ of Bogota Gonzalo Jimenez de Quesada. There was no statue now. When I was taking some photograph of this place, suddenly Juan narrated me an interesting story. He says that this place has a tall statue of Gonzalo Jiménez de Quesada, considered to be the founder of Bogota. On May 7, 2021, a wide protest by an indigenous community protested against government policies and toppled the statue. Perhaps, that was the time when anti colonial protests in various places in the United States too found, idols and statues of various European ‘explorers’ in USA, UK and elsewhere got demolished by indigenous communities as well as other such native movement who felt that all these European explorers were not really ‘explorer’ but oppressors of the native indigenous communities. Juan says, Gonzalo Jiménez de Quesasa was a Spanish conqueror that proclaimed himself a founder of Bogotá, on August 6, 1538, as Santa Fe de Bogotá (a city that was actually founded over an indigenous Muisca territory called Bacatá). He and his acquaintances decided to change the name and to initially put it 'Santa Fe de Bogotá' (like The Holy faith of Bogotá). He is also known for being one of those who participated in El Dorado (The Gold) search, which means an exploration where they tried to search a ton of gold under the water and in the territory nearby to Bacata (with the stealing s and dispossession s associated to it). Gold and mineral exploration was one of the basic targets of those who voyaged through Antarctic Ocean to reach this part of the world. Moreover, that exploration would not have been possible without dispossessing the native communities. Juan is a human right defender who has studied in Sweden and Norway but his heart is in defending his native people’s rights as his parents belong to the peasantry.

Juan says, during COVID-19 times, the was a national riot because of the injustices that came to be more explicit due to the pandemic. Bogotá was once the centers for protests against the extreme right government which we had at that time. Indigenous communities came and joined protest from different social classes. On that scenario they were protesting once in the main downtown squares and in the one where Gonzalo de Jiménez was -which is located just in front of the Rosario University (i.e. one of the most conservative universities in our country, where many of our former presidents became lawyers)-, a group decided to take down the statue of Gonzalo Jiménez de Quezada, as it was happening in other parts of the country. Due to the popularity of the action, some of the people tried to call the main avenue which was next to it Misak Avenue (which is the name of one of the indigenous groups that participated in taking down the statue) instead of Jiménez Avenue, as it was called before. Nowadays the statue hasn't come back, mainly because we don't want it there at all. Citizenship wouldn't let it to arrive once again’.





Actually, when people face brutalities of the system for long, they realise that the system they have inherited is over 200 years old and therefore all those who are the symbols of those injustices face the wrath of the people, resulting in the ‘breaking’ of those ‘statues. While this is a debatable issue whether people should be demolishing those symbols of wrongs or oppression but it is a fact that they have survived for long because of the patronage of the ruling elite.

Explorers or Invaders

Colombia was named after Christopher Columbus even when he did not travel this country, it is named after him and this explains how the history of a country is erased or reconstructed. Christopher Columbas Day is celebrated on Second Monday to commemorate the arrival of the explorer in the Americas on October 12th, 1492. The popular narrative imposed on us is that Columbus ‘discovered’ America as if it did not exist before 1492.

It was almost the same time when Vasco Da Gama arrived in India from Lisbon, Portugal on May 20th, 1498 on the cost of Calicut in Kerala. For years, we were given to memorise the story that it was Vasco Da Gama who ‘discovered’ India. Again, the same question as if India did not exist before that. Now, Europe had knowledge, power and understanding. They were writing our history and ‘teaching’ us ‘culture’ too but now people have realized and that is why they question. The native historians everywhere can’t term these people as merely ‘explorer’ but invaders and oppressors. The Indigenous students in various Universities all over the world are now seeking explanation and many decided not to celebrate ‘Columbus Day’ but as Indigenous People’s Day. History has become the crucial factor to build our future. Colonialists used it for their benefit and now the ‘nationalists’ too doing the same. However, history can give us good lesson as we do not live in history but can build our future based on the lessons we have from these incidents.

Just on the back of this historical structure, we are at the gates of a university known as Universidad del Rosario, initially known as Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario was established on October 19. 1653 by Fray Cristóbal de Torres, Archbishop of Santafé de Bogotá. The University is considered to be the oldest university in Columbia and has a strong catholic root brought by the Spanish colonisers. It was started as a college to educate the Spanish settlers with particular aim in governance and theology. So, governance and religion went together to protect the colonial interests. In 1704, it was converted into full university offering courses on law, theology and Philosophy. The university became the biggest ‘coaching’ centre for the European American settler elite in Colombia who influenced political and cultural lives of Colombia. It was really not the place where the native indigenous people could study. The University was clearly a colonial project to provide elite government officers for running the country.



Juan says, ‘the Universidad del Rosario was founded in 1653 by Friar Cristóbal de Torres, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in Colombia. It is one of the universities that historically defended the conservative side of the Catholic Church, as well as its approach to education. Since its inception, it has sought to hold its classes in a cloistered setting and present itself as an educational center for the country's political elite. Proof of this is that the Universidad del Rosario has had nine Colombian presidents as graduates, making it the university with the most presidents in the country. It was so conservative that the Universidad Externado was created in 1886 to represent a private university more open to the public. It has also attempted to limit the use of public space; for example, they planted bushes around the statue in front of it (which was later torn down) where students from other popular universities would gather. Now, given its poor results in international exams and corruption scandals, one of its 'most reputable' careers, which is law, today has one of the lowest enrollment rates in known private universities.’

This is how the colonial projects worked. Assault people, control their education, deny them quality education, create a servile class which could protect the interest of the Spanish empire and suppress it further from the massive religious propaganda in the rural areas through religion as ‘liberation theology’. The protests or rebellion was brutally suppressed. And it was not merely physical oppression or suppression but also emotional enslavement too. Here religion played in important role as it came as ‘liberator’ for the oppressed also. For years, the indigenous people were not allowed to have ‘communion’ but it was Fray Cristóbal de Torres, who governed this Archbishopric in 1636, that is, one hundred years after the Spanish European conquest, was the first to resolve to grant Communion to the native Indians.

Unbroken structure of the Colonial Empire and vision of a Greater Colombia

Ironically, the biggest hero of the anti-colonial movement in Colombia Simon Bolivar. named his country as Colombia. Bolivar Square has the powerful standing statue of Simon Bolivar who dreamt of a Greater Colombia which include present day Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Panama as its core constituent but his vision was to unite and organize the entire Spanish speaking territories under one umbrella that included certain parts of Peru as well as Bolivia but it was not possible due various internal rivalries and issues. Bolivar passed away in 1830 and idea of a Greater Colombia got dissolved in 1831 with the formation of different states. Bogota’s most popular public square is dedicated to Simon Bolivar and it is named as Bolivar Square and is surrounded by various historical buildings, a cathedral and old markets.  It was declared a Colombian National Monument on October 19, 1995. It was built in 1539 under the name Plaza Mayor and was also the place where the Independence Cry was proclaimed on July 20, 1810. There is a bronze statue of Simon Bolivar created by the Italian artist Pietro Tenerani in 1846. This is considered to be the first public monument of Bogota city.

While Simon Bolivar is undoubtedly the greatest anti colonial hero almost revered in this part of the world yet like many other former colonies, his administration too functioned on the foundation of the former colonial empires. When you have bigger focus on ‘external’ things, there is little time for resolving domestic crisis. The result was Colombia faced bigger challenges at the domestic front with inequality grew rapidly and urban elite of ‘settlers’ continue to control the land resources of the country. The result was violent insurgency all over the country in the form of communist armed resistance which got subdued only once the government signed a Peace Accord with them in 2016 with active support and assistance from Cuba.

Liberation theology of Abya Yala

It was important for the church to delink itself from the horrific past and its association with the colonial regime that inflicted greater wound on the psyche of the native communities particularly the Indigenous people in the Latin America. By associating with the masses and their struggle, the Church was able to win the heart of the people and today won the confidence of the former Communists too.

As the church does not have a glorious history everywhere particularly in this region but by continuous association with the local communities helped it continuously evolved over the years. It might have come as an agent of the colonial powers at many places but it continues to grow at its own and provided space to the dissenting voices and that is how the church in Colombia became the symbol of National liberation as well as national integration. Today, it also has presence among the indigenous communities who speak up against the colonial project. I call it the power of Christianity which learn and unlearn many things over the year and stood up with the most marginalized. It is no surprising that Vatican and Popes have spoken openly against the violence. Despite Western hypocrisy on Gaza and Palestine issue, it is Pope who stood taller and condemn the invasion on Gaza and spoke for the rights of the marginalized elsewhere. That way, Christianity liberated itself from being mouthpiece of the western empires and found accepted from the most marginalized world over.




In the Latin America, Christianity is trying to somehow dissociate with the power history of the colonial empire which erased native culture, traditions and languages of the native people here. The church is now ‘reframing the Christian message grounded in the people and not power, grounded in ancestry, not acclaim, and grounded in historical context, not in silence’[i].  

As the Indigenous communities in the Americas are exposing the barbarianism of the colonialism and looking for their ancestry and feeling proud of it so are the Christians attempting to be part of the side of the native. Today, the term ‘Abya Yala is used by the indigenous ethnic communities in north and South America to refer to the landmasses generally known as the Americas/America. Abya Yala is a term derived from the Guna language of the Kuna people indigenous to Panama and Colombia translating to ‘land of fertile blood’. Although exclusively originating within the indigenous Kuna people of Panama and Colombia, Abya Yala is also used by several contemporary indigenous people such as the Mapuche of Chile, the Quechua of Peru and the Mexica of Mexico’[ii].

As the issue of Abya Yala gain traction among the native indigenous people across the Latin America, the Church too have developed a Abya Yala theology which accordingly ‘is Christian thought analyzed through a decolonizing lens and embracing a multicultural and multiethnic continent, from which God speaks and liberates all from colonized oppression.[iii]

Christianity in the beginning was ‘Inextricably linked with colonial and settler thinking is the vision of land and nature as a resource that exists only for extractive purposes. However, understanding Abya Yala Theology is reimagining the harmonious relationship between the land, their children, and all creation’[iv].

Perhaps being part of Abya Yala’s native people’s identity and assertion issues, Christianity is rediscovering itself in the oppressed communities and regions where their track record has been nothing but an enabler of plunder, loot and destruction of the identity and civilization of the indigenous people by the Colonizers.  Today, it is standing hand in hand with the oppressed masses of Colombia and working towards an everlasting peace that follow the framework of Abya Yala.

References:



[i]  Yenny Delgado and Claudio Ramirez, Abya Yala Theology, Decolonizing the Christian message from a native perspective,  https://publicatheology.org/2022/04/06/abya-yala-theology/

 

[ii] https://library.cfa.harvard.edu/abya-yala

 

[iii] Yenny Delgado and Claudio Ramirez, Abya Yala Theology, Decolonizing the Christian message from a native perspective,  https://publicatheology.org/2022/04/06/abya-yala-theology/

[iv] do

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Will our ruling parties ever learnt from failure of Emergency in 1975

 T

Nothing meaningful is achieved by opening up an issue already settled politically

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

he history in this country is woven around building narrative as well as myths around popular figures. A lot has been said and written about the imposition of Emergency on intervening night of June 25th-26th 1975 by the then Prime Minister Mrs Indira Gandhi under article 352 of the Constitution. So, emergency was not imposed outside the constitution but very much through a constitutional provision and not by 'murdering' it. It might have been an immoral act or undemocratic but definitely not unconstitutional as it was part of the constitution. I hope some day an honest appraisal of emergency and a proper scanning of the heroes who enjoyed power post emergency after Indira Gandhi was defeated in the Parliamentary elections. Researchers and historians must find out the truth.

Political historians should  analyse  Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha''s verdict against the prime minister Indira Gandhi ? Did he intentionally call her to Court to humiliate or embarrass her. Did it serve any purpose or created an unprecedented constitutional crisis ? We have never seen such a case again even when it is a well known fact how ruling parties often misuse bureaucracy and government machinery. Was Indira Gandhi the only leader who misused power and all others are too democratic to misuse it ? Can any court do such a thing in today's time. If a court gives a judgement against any powerful leader what will the government do ? Was this a normal decision or was there a conspiracy to derail the government and create anarchy ?

Actually, !975 crisis is a lesson for all. For political parties, for judiciary, for media as well as for the government.

What could the government do when Jai Prakash Narayan called for a total revolt against the government from the police and armed forces. Was that not an act of inciting a rebellion ? Indira Gandhi could or should have initiated a political dialogue but somewhere she failed to rise on the occasion and depended too much on a coterie that just found ways and means to legitimise her acts particularly that of her son Sanjay Gandhi.

We also need to understand the political ideology of forces opposed to Indira Gandhi ?

Who was Morarji Desai and how did he become prime minister instead of Babu Jagjivan Ram ? The whole Janata experiment failed because of overambitious leaders and their rigidities in humiliating Mrs Gandhi. If Indira had failed in politically handling the crisis, Janata leaders failed miserably and believed in tit for tat. The result was that people got fed up with their antics and brought back Indira Gandhi with a thumping mandate.
We need to go a bit earlier in the 1970s when Indira Gandhi took some extremely radical and revolutionary decisions. Land Distribution was one major factor. Implementation of reservation was another important decision. Nationalisation of Banks and insurance companies. Doing away with privy purses of the erstwhile Raja Maharajas. Now, remember, who was opposed to Nationalisation of Banks and strengthening of the public sector ? Yes, It was Moraraji Desai, who later became Prime minister. Don't we understand that the 1971 Indo Soviet Peace Treaty which actually helped India from any further Chinese aggression and ultimately helped create Bangladesh was always a bone of contention. So, most of these self proclaimed socialists had a pro American slant. World over socialism has inherent link with Marxism and left politics and prior to Lohia and Jai Prakash, there was a leader of great courage of conviction, named Acharya Narendra Dev, a scholar on Buddhism but completely forgotten and ignored by the Samajwadis today, many of them might not even heard. Why did socialism in India take a pro American turn ? Does the 1977 uprising against Indira Gandhi have any linkage with those who never wanted Indo Russia friendship ?
Do we know that despite so much noise, Janata Party won merely 295 seats and Congress under Indira Gandhi won 154 seats. There was a sharp difference between the voting pattern of North and South. Indira Gandhi lost RaiBareilly seat and Sanjay Gandhi was defeated in Amethi but Mrs Gandhi returned to Parliament after winning from Chikmanglur in Karnataka.
Now what was the reason for Indira Gandhi's defeat in 1977. I can bet it. The reason was not the detention of political prisoners but mostly the compulsory sterilisation campaign in the name of family planning and this was under instructions of Sanjay Gandhi. It was resented by people vehemently. Second issue was the highhandedness of government officials in removing 'encroachments'. Both these actions of highhandedness actually hurt and impacted negatively, Congresses core vote bank, the scheduled castes and Muslims. The results were obvious. Congress lost their support.
Interestingly, Sanjay Gandhi's anti sterilisation initiative as well as his bulldozing at Turkman Gate on May 31st, 1976 got the biggest support from RSS and Jan Sangh. Congress actually paid the price of Emergency due to Sanjay Gandhi's highhandedness against Muslims as well as other marginalised communities.
Indira Gandhi brought Secular and socialism in the Constitution and also added article 51a, our constitutional duties, an important point.
Emergency was a wrong decision politically for a leader who had become immensely popular and was slowly pushing her son Sanjay Gandhi for the leadership issue. She was too dependent on her and in haste to become Supreme leader, Sanjay actually created an intimidating environment. Rather than handling the discontent against the government politically, he felt they needed to be dealt almost like criminals. It resulted in widespread anger against the party in north India.
Remember, the Janata leaders could not build anything and the two years they focused only on humiliating Indira Gandhi. The people of India did not take it lightly. The Janata government failed due to its own contradictions. RSS became the point of difference. It resulted in snap polls in 1980 and the people of India gave Indira Gandhi and Congress party one of the biggest mandates. Congress won 353 seats and Indira Gandhi won not only from Raibareilly but also from Medak in Andhra Pradesh that time.
We must remember one thing. It is time for political parties to understand that people don't like highhandedness and they punished Congress for that but the same people did not like Janata Party leaders humiliating Indira Gandhi and defeated them.
Emergency should not have been imposed but it needs to be seen whether such an important issue could have been dealt with by the judiciary in a different way. Will some one critique Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha and Shanti Bhushan responsible for creating a constitutional crisis. I don't know but I feel such important matters which can have far reaching consequences need to be heard by a constitution bench so that the country is saved from anarchy and chaos.
Emergency was a political failure of Indira Gandhi, was an immoral act but not unconstitutional as those powers are still with the government. If we all are so upset about that then the government must bring a constitutional amendment and remove those powers so that no powerful leader can dare to impose it on people and their political opponents. Indira Gandhi brought Foreign Contribution Regulation Act ( FCRA)during emergency to curtail political opposition and civil society and this law is still there to punish civil society organisations. Why can't these remnants of the emergency be removed ?
And lastly the most important part. The pro American lobby led by Jai Prakash blamed Indira Gandhi for trying to create a Soviet Style dictatorial structure in India while Indira Gandhi blamed them being funded by the CIA but one fact is there. India's' right wing always aspired that India has better relations with the West particularly with the United States. Indira Gandhi stood solidly on the foundation of Indo Soviet Friendship. Fifty years after the emergency, the political opponents of Indira Gandhi are actually following her foreign policy and Russia India friendship is on a rock solid foundation.
Let us not be caged in our past. Impartial understanding of history provides lessons for all so that our future generations do not face it. Politically, the issue is settled as Indira Gandhi never defended it. She was defeated by people and the same people brought her back by defeating her opponents who had come to power just two years back. Let us move forward and focus on issues concerning the nation. Indira Gandhi was one of the greatest prime minister that India ever had and denigrating her for wrong political decision which is duly settled as people defeated her party in 1977. One must remember that the same people brought her back with a massive mandate in 1980 which means the people had forgiven her for the mistake and wanted to move ahead. Therefore, no purpose is solved by deliberately raising the issue time and again. The best way is to defeat undemocratic value system inside us and ensure that such a decision is not taken by any elected leader.  

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Russia India Relationship on solid rock foundation

 


Vidya Bhushan Rawat

The grand welcome given to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modis' in Russia has not been taken kindly in the Western capitals because of various reasons. Many in India too are commenting it in contempt without knowing the warm relationship between the two countries. Indian leaders always received a rousing reception in the Soviet Union. Jawahar Lal Nehru and Indira Gandhi are highly popular names in Russia and all the CIS countries even today. One is the timing of it when NATO allies were meeting in Washington to celebrate 75 years of its formation. The question is why should India bother about it and why is the Western world expecting too much from India. India has been a traditional ally of Russia for long and it is not a government imposed thing but people of both the countries understand it. Fact of the matter is that India's right wing was never comfortable with our ties with Russia. The Gujarat lobby particularly the business one felt that their interests are well built in maintaining relationships with the western world. Then there are liberals who are promoted by various American 'policy organizations' to promote their interests in the name of 'democracy'. Just think of a time when Indira Gandhi was taking Indo Russia friendship to a new level in 1971, she nationalised the Banks, Insurance companies, withdrew all the privy purses given to former crowns of different Riyasats and imposed Land Ceiling laws, redistributed land, strengthened Public sector undertakings and implemented reservation for scheduled castes and tribes. Who opposed all these measures ? The corporate lobby, supported by Morarji Desai, Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy and others.

While western liberals were crying foul against Communist Soviet Union, the same governments were promoting China as a counter force to the Soviets on one side and Taliban and Islamic fanatics in Pakistan on the other side. It is a fact that the entire global south opted to be part of the Non Aligned Movement to save itself from the American bullying and standing with Soviet Russia.

The 1990s were the most crucial phase of world politics. In August 1991 there was a coup against Mikhail Gorbachev, the Secretary General of the Communist Party of Soviet Union. That failed but soon there were revolts in many other republics who ceded from the Soviet Union. The western world rejoiced that their betenoir is now crushed. They started promoting their interest in smaller countries and ignored all these so called independent countries that were part of the former Soviet Union and were nursed by them but the west wanted to make them hostile against Russia. The fact is that the Russian Federation was still worlds' largest country and powerful but everyone enjoyed the 'fall of the Communist Empire. Indian liberals too were happy as they felt the Indian establishment would be tilting more towards the United States and other Western countries. Most of them were speaking about Russia as if there are people dying of hunger and malnutrition. Western commentators rejoice in mocking Russia when speaking about that country but those who have seen Moscow and other places can vouch that a metro in Moscow is far superior to that in New York. Moscow is truly a beautiful city.

Vladimir Putin may be termed as dictator and undemocratic but there is no doubt in saying that he has brought glory to Russia like a phoenix. It is a country full of confidence and prosperity. Russia's actions against Ukraine were based on its national interest and to protect Russian speaking people from what it alleged were the Nazis there. The fact that NATO has been trying to encircle Russia is a well known fact. How can Indians forget that they did the same. Supporting China and then promoting Pakistan's anti India rhetoric was part of that attempt to encircle India too. Today, the west wants us to believe that Russia is a junior partner of China. In their hatred and contempt for Russia they can go to any length even not asking for elections in Ukraine. How is Zelensky being allowed as leader of Ukraine when the man has arrested all the dissenters and political opponents. Russia tried to negotiate and withdrew its forces from Kiev but that was considered a weakness and now it seems NATO is preparing for a final showdown with Russia which will be dangerous and only take us to World War III. The world can't afford it but then you can not bring peace by humiliating Russia which is growing more powerful and has bigger acceptance globally right from Africa to Asia and Latin America.

Unfortunately in India, we all suffer from amnesia of the western media propaganda about the word left and socialism and its relation with Russia. Even when the tide is turning in a different direction in Europe after the recent elections in France. In Britain too left socialist forces will get strengthened in future. In India, we somehow have become victims of the Western Propaganda as far as Russia is concerned. Narendra Modi just finished his trip to Russia. As usual, Russia gave him a huge welcome. Both the countries are playing their politics. Some for their domestic constituency while for Russia it is addressing to the global elite that Russia or Vladimir Putin is not a pariah. Frankly speaking, many of the comments in India about Russia suffer from the hatred towards the left. Some of these experts feel as if Russia is suffering after the Americans and Europeans have put their sanctions on them. Well, these sanctions don't even work for a country like North Korea. Every country has its own strategy and North Korea too may be a matter of joke for us but look at their capital city Pyongyang which is beautiful and only show that we should not make our opinion based on the Western media narrative.

The Western World defines communities, societies and people as per its own conveniences and we have just been following it. Russia has been a global power and the world owes to them to defeat the Nazi forces Hitler during the second world war.
The election of President Putin became a butt of jokes for everyone including political leaders. They forgot that Russia, even when it was the Soviet Union, never had the governance structure as followed by the West. China too had a similar pattern for their governance structure. They have their critique about Western democracy, which is a fast turning right controlled by the big bag corporations. Democracy or no is an internal matter of Russia and they will deal with it but the fact is that Russia is the fastest growing economy and the world bank itself has put it among the High Income Countries.
The fact is that Russia is a powerful country with enormous energy resources. It has no issue about land mass. It knows what is good for us. Most importantly, it has stood with India through thick and thin. India Russia friendship started immediately after our independence. Even during independence, a large number of freedom fighters got support from Russia.
Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru was highly impressed with the Soviet Union and Indira Gandhi gave it a new height. We all know how the Americans and Brits created a hostile environment in 1971 and it was the Soviet Union that came in open support of India during the War with Pakistan and the result was creation of Bangladesh.
What I wish to state here is that the Indo Russia relationship is time tested. Ofcourse, after the 1990s event when many republics broke away from Russia, the Western world and much of India felt that Russia is a gone case but Vladimir Putin has brought it back to new heights. Today, Russia is not isolated but helping create a multipolar world. With Mali-Niger-Burkina Faso throwing the French American forces out of their soil, we are witnessing a new wave of anti colonial movement in Africa and Latin America. One can not ignore how the peoples' résistance in Bolivia foiled a coup attempt by the military there against the President.
People of the global south now realise how in the name of democracy, western world created unrest in various countries and intervened. The issues of India will be resolved by people of India and those trying to find its solution in Brussels or Washington will not succeed as it is the people in our states, in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Bengal, Tamilnadu elsewhere will decide what is good or bad for India. Let us not mock Russia and its support to India which is based on a historic relationship with two people. Don't forget Raj Kapoor's immortal 'mera juta hai jaapani, ye patloon englistani, sar pe laal topi rusi, fir bhi dil hai hindustani' still reverberating in the air in Russia. Awara hoon is one of the most popular songs there. Russian literature has been hugely popular in India. So, this relationship is not merely based on military alliance but also cultural one. Except for the Western dependent Indian urban elite, Russia remain in the heart of rest of working class Indians who enjoyed the pro people policies and programmes of the government.

Countries have the right to decide about their foreign policies. India is as much independent as Russia and both countries today are redefining their relationship. I am sure even if the governments change here and there this relationship will remain the same and grow further. It is similar to the Western World. The first visit of a British Prime Minister, normally, is to visit White House, whether she is a Tory or a Labour. Let India and Russia celebrate their historic relationship which stands on rock solid foundations. Let us not mock it for our petty political considerations.
Celebrate the Indo Russian friendship.

Sunday, July 07, 2024

UK Elections : Democracy turning 'right' in liberal world

 

Labour as Conservative is the New Ruling Party in UK

Vidya Bhushan Rawat

 

The smooth and quick transfer of power in UK speak volume on the great democratic tradition in that country. Election results came out during the day and by the afternoon outgoing Prime Minister Rishi Sunak went to Buckingham Palace to tender his resignation. By the time, he stepped out, Labour leader Keir Starmer was appointed the Prime Minister by the King and within minutes he addresses the nation at the historic entrance of No 10-downing street. The Prime minister paid tribute to his predecessor Rishi Sunak and acknowledged his contribution to Britain. With-in hours, the Prime Minister announced his cabinet and the transfer of power was completed without any pomp and show. Britain, that way, is a great example unlike United States where the new President takes oath nearly two months after the results are out in November in a great pomp and show though both the forms of governments are based on majoritarianism and revolve around the white power elite of these countries.  

The outcome of result might sound music to many who might dance on hearing the word ‘labour’ as in most of the world, the term is almost deleted in the ‘vocabulary’ of political discourse. In the United States, there is no Labour. There is the fight between two parties of white ruling elite dominated by the corporate interest with little interest for the common person. Now, Labour party returned to power after 14 years and with massive majority but are the Conservatives decimated in UK?  Has the Labour anything to do with the left politics? What brought Labour to power in UK?

The fact is that the historical route of Conservative Party does not indicate the growth of ‘left wing’ political forces in Britain. The fact is this landslide to Labour party is more to do with the faulty electoral system that UK has been following termed as First Past the Post System which result in huge gap between the vote share and the number of seat got. FPTP can be useful if there are only two to three parties as well as a high voter turnout. In the absence of it, the mandate can always be haunting though at the end of the day, it does not matter, how much is the vote share, it is the number of seats that matter.


Turning 'Right'

The fact of the matter is that out of 650 seats, Labour Party has won 412 seats which is almost 65% of seats though the vote share was merely 34%. Its rival Conservative Party with 24% vote share acquired 121 seats. Liberals got 71 seats with 12% votes. Another right wing under the name Reformist Party, though, only got 4 seats but with 14% vote share. Led by Nigel Farage, Reformists are being blamed for the route of the Tory government. Conservative, Liberals and Reformists mostly hail from the same variety of political ideology of right wing. Their combine vote share is much powerful than that of Labour. The left leaning groups are mostly independent and Green Party.  Interestingly, Labour could only increase its vote share of about 2% from 2019 when it fought under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn who contested as an independent candidate and won from Islington North constituency by over 7,000 votes defeating the nearest Labour Party rival. Corbyn has been representing this constituency since 1983 and has won for a record 11 times.

Many people might be happy to see return of a ‘Labour’ government after one and a half decade but is it really so. Leave aside the ‘vote share and seat got’ issue, the fact is most of the western electoral system particularly influence by British and American models are already captured by the right-wing capitalist forces. The quality of the ‘western democratic model’ is in its propaganda and comparison with the Russian and Chinese system despite the fact that both the countries are today a power house and rising high economically. Look at the rise of other powerful groups in UK like Liberal Democrats and Reformists both ideologically close to Conservatives but is ‘Labour’ truly dedicated to left or the working classes. The problem with the ‘liberal democracies’ in the world is their hypocrisy on human rights issues. If Labour Party was truly dedicated to the idea as its name suggest then how come powerful leaders like Jeremy Corbyn thrown away from the party. Is it because he was considered more radical and a threat to the Empire and its elite. How is the current leadership of Labour different than the Conservative. The brazen shamelessness of Kier Stramer in refusing to condemn the Israeli brutalities and assault on Gaza shocked all those who filled the Streets of United Kingdom demanding a complete ceasefire in Gaza. It was Kier responsible for humiliating and ousting Jeremy Corbyn and other left leaning leaders from Labour Party. Most of these leaders fought independently won with a handsome margin and defeated their nearest Labour rivals. The poll result suggest that British electorate are swinging between different conservative forces and Labour got acceptability because it threw away radical left forces led by Jeremy Corbyn. So essentially, British political system is highly dominated and controlled by the Conservatives who may not be Conservative Party but also Labour, Liberal and Reformists.

The Crisis of Electoral System

The British model of electoral system or simply FPTP is not reflective of the real verdict of the people. It is basically manipulative of the power elite and therefore most of the time legitimize a ‘minority’ government as ‘majority. All the colonies of the ‘Empire’ has this system which is used by the power elite of those countries using or misusing the contradiction among different groups. The difference between vote share and seat won is too high. The Labour got nearly 34% of total vote polled out of 60% votes that were polled during these elections. Which simply mean 40% people did not vote during the election. Now, in terms of seat, the party got 412 seats out of 650 which is nearly 64%. Under the Proportional Electorate System, Labour with 34% vote share would have just got 221 seats much below the majority mark. Conservatives with 21% vote share would have got 156 instead of 121 which they have at the moment. Liberal with 12% vote share got 71 seats while Reformists with 14% vote share got just 4 seats. Under the Proportionate system, Liberals could have got 78 and Reformists 91. Even a 4 seat Green Party with 7% vote would have got nearly 46 seats.

How credible is the electoral system where party getting 34% votes which also mean 66% votes that were polled did vote against you. Interestingly, a party with 14% vote share get just 4seat while that with 12% vote share 71 seats. Now, how can such a system be justified as ‘democratic’. We all have the same crisis and the result is that the ruling parties and government actually rarely listen to people’s’ voices. The amount of massive street protests that London witnessed in support of Palestine was always looked down upon by the power elite and the media. The governments these days speak through the power elite and opposition leader spoke the language of the prime minister when he openly supported the previous government’s stand on Palestine.

 

No change in Foreign Policy

Actually, western democracies are liberal to the large extent related to individual freedom, right to faith, criticism of the government and allowing protests in the streets but at the same point of time we need to understand why a leader like Jeremy Corbyn was ousted from Labour ? Why he has been a persona non grata for the ‘liberal’ circles. A similar thing happened in United States where Bernie Sanders is despised by the ruling elite. The liberal democracies can’t accept Julian Assange and felt him the biggest threat. It needs to be understood why these democracies do not listen to the voices of protests in the streets.

Broadly, the western democracy will remain pro capitalist and market driven and nothing much is expected to change on the foreign policy matters though the new Prime Minister as already rescinded the Rwanda policy for refugees which is a great step in right direction. The Tory government wanted to privatise the prestigious National Health Services but could not do so. The railway network is already in distress. Will the new government take initiatives to strengthen these services or will it be the same government that was headed by Tony Blair ? 

The issue of minorities and immigrants are extremely important and resulted in victory of four independent candidates who defeated Labour candidates. The party has to see whether it will follow the ‘right tilt of Tony Blair or really work differently particularly on the issue of Palestine. It needs to understand that the combine vote share of the right-wing parties is much higher than it and if it ignore wider concern of minorities and immigrants then it might loses the support of progressive forces as well as ethnic minorities then Britain might see rise of radical left forces in the coming years. Unlike the United States, Britain still has got space for minorities and immigrants in the political structure. Will Jeremy Corbyn and other leaders emerge more powerful in the coming years or the pressure of capitalist forces including a hostile media make them politically insignificant? 

Lesson for India

A democracy is successful when its institutions are robust. Britain has a powerful legacy in that regard. The election process is extremely simple and voting opens at 7 am and continue till 10 pm. The parliament still is responsible and debates there are worth watching. Prime Minister’s Question hour with leader of opposition is extremely fascinating but then we cant have that in India.

The New Parliament has 23 Muslim members (A big country like India has just 24) and over 60% of the members belong to ethnic minorities reflecting Britain’s diversity. One thing need to be clarified. A criticism of the British system does not mean we are better than them. They have a robust system and more over basic curtsies among the political class there remain far superior than us. The swiftness with which the new government took charge with in a day remain remarkable. Everything was done without any chest thumping or ‘victory’ speeches. It is also important to understand the difference of ‘right wing’ or Conservatives in Britain, Europe and India. The Conservatives or Right Wing there are mostly against immigration policies of the government but none of them have ventured inside the personal lives of people. Right wing in India and its neighbors are basically religious fanatics who have issues with your personal choices whether food, faith or marriage. There are no hate speeches and diversity of representation is always a plus point for political parties.

Britain’s elections have big lessons for us and our political class. That elections in vibrant democracies today is on ballot paper and not through EVMs is a reality. Secondly, we did not hear any complaints of electoral malfunctioning or fraud. The counting and declaration process was simple and Prepoll surveys or Exit polls were not hyped. The prime minister did not take time in vacating his official bungalow and gone to submit his resignation to the King when results were just coming in and he conceded his defeat gracefully. The transfer of power was so swift and meticulous that there was no time for any confusion and uncertainty.  Yes, electoral system has issues of representation\ and vibrant democracies find their own solution. Britain will certainly have to look into it as this might become a major issue in the coming days.

Let us hope new government will fulfill the aspirations of the people but expecting a different perspective on Ukraine and Israel will be next to impossible as foreign policy matters in these countries are mostly static and fixed with United States. A change in its Ukraine or Palestine policy will need Jeremy Corbyn at the helm of affair which does not seem a possibility in the near future.